首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >Copper and tin isotopic analysis of ancient bronzes for archaeological investigation: development and validation of a suitable analytical methodology
【24h】

Copper and tin isotopic analysis of ancient bronzes for archaeological investigation: development and validation of a suitable analytical methodology

机译:用于考古研究的古青铜的铜和锡同位素分析:合适分析方法的开发和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although in many cases Pb isotopic analysis can be relied on for provenance determination of ancient bronzes, sometimes the use of “non-traditional” isotopic systems, such as those of Cu and Sn, is required. The work reported on in this paper aimed at revising the methodology for Cu and Sn isotope ratio measurements in archaeological bronzes via optimization of the analytical procedures in terms of sample pre-treatment, measurement protocol, precision, and analytical uncertainty. For Cu isotopic analysis, both Zn and Ni were investigated for their merit as internal standard (IS) relied on for mass bias correction. The use of Ni as IS seems to be the most robust approach as Ni is less prone to contamination, has a lower abundance in bronzes and an ionization potential similar to that of Cu, and provides slightly better reproducibility values when applied to NIST SRM 976 Cu isotopic reference material. The possibility of carrying out direct isotopic analysis without prior Cu isolation (with AG-MP-1 anion exchange resin) was investigated by analysis of CRM IARM 91D bronze reference material, synthetic solutions, and archaeological bronzes. Both procedures (Cu isolationo Cu isolation) provide similar δ~(65)Cu results with similar uncertainty budgets in all cases (±0.02–0.04 per mil in delta units, k02, n0 4). Direct isotopic analysis of Cu therefore seems feasible, without evidence of spectral interference or matrix-induced effect on the extent of mass bias. For Sn, a separation protocol relying on TRU-Spec anion exchange resin was optimized, providing a recovery close to 100 % without oncolumn fractionation. Cu was recovered quantitatively together with the bronze matrix with this isolation protocol. Isotopic analysis of this Cu fraction provides δ~(65)Cu results similar to those obtained upon isolation using AG-MP-1 resin. This means that Cu and Sn isotopic analysis of bronze alloys can therefore be carried out after a single chromatographic separation using TRU-Spec resin. Tin isotopic analysis was performed relying on Sb as an internal standard used for mass bias correction. The reproducibility over a period of 1 month (n042) for the mass bias-corrected Sn isotope ratios is in the range of 0.06–0.16 per mil (2 s), for all the ratios monitored.
机译:尽管在许多情况下可以依靠Pb同位素分析来确定古青铜的出处,但有时仍需要使用“非传统”同位素系统,例如Cu和Sn。本文报道的工作旨在通过优化样品前处理,测量规程,精度和分析不确定度的分析程序,修改考古青铜中铜和锡同位素比的测量方法。对于Cu同位素分析,研究了Zn和Ni的优点,作为质量偏差校正所依赖的内标(IS)。使用Ni作为IS似乎是最可靠的方法,因为Ni不太容易受到污染,青铜的丰度较低,电离势与Cu相似,并且在应用于NIST SRM 976 Cu时可提供更好的重现性值同位素参考资料。通过对CRM IARM 91D青铜参考材料,合成溶液和考古青铜的分析,研究了无需事先分离铜(使用AG-MP-1阴离子交换树脂)而无需进行直接同位素分析的可能性。两种方法(铜隔离/无铜隔离)在所有情况下都提供相似的δ〜(65)Cu结果,并具有相似的不确定性预算(每密耳单位±0.02–0.04,单位d02,n02)。因此,对铜进行直接同位素分析似乎是可行的,而没有光谱干扰或基质引起的对质量偏差程度的影响的证据。对于锡,优化了依赖于TRU-Spec阴离子交换树脂的分离方案,无需柱分离即可提供接近100%的回收率。通过该隔离方案,可将铜与青铜基质一起定量回收。对该铜馏分的同位素分析提供的δ〜(65)Cu结果与使用AG-MP-1树脂分离得到的结果相似。因此,这意味着可以在使用TRU-Spec树脂进行一次色谱分离之后,对青铜合金的Cu和Sn同位素进行分析。锡同位素分析是依靠Sb作为质量偏差校正的内标进行的。对于质量比校正的锡同位素比率,在所有监测的比率下,在1个月内(n042)的重现性都在0.06-0.16 / mil(2 s)的范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号