...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >Optimisation of stir bar sorptive extraction and in-tube derivatisation-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of several endocrine disruptor compounds in environmental water samples
【24h】

Optimisation of stir bar sorptive extraction and in-tube derivatisation-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of several endocrine disruptor compounds in environmental water samples

机译:搅拌棒吸附萃取和管内衍生化-热脱附-气相色谱-质谱法优化用于测定环境水样中的几种内分泌干扰物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The analysis of organic pollutants in environmental water samples requires a pre-concentration step. Pre-concentration techniques such as stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) have gained popularity since they minimise the use of toxic organic solvents and can be considered as green analytical techniques. Similar to other pre-concentration techniques, one of the problems when SBSE is used is the matrix effect, which often occurs during the analysis of environmental water samples such as estuarine or wastewater samples. The present work studied the matrix effect during SBSE coupled to in-tube derivatisation-thermal desorption (TD)-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of several endocrine disruptor compounds, such as alkylphenols, bisphenol A, estrogens and sterols, in environmental water samples, after optimisation of the major variables affecting the determination. Variables such as the addition of methanol or an inert salt to the donor phase, the extraction temperature, the volume of the donor phase, the stirring rate and the extraction time were studied during the SBSE optimisation. In the case of the in-tube derivatisation and TD step, the volume of the derivatisation reagent (N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) triufloroacetamide with 1% of trimethylchlorosilane (BSTFA + 1% TMCS)) and the cryo-focusing temperature were fixed (2 μL and -50 °C, respectively) according to a consensus between maximum signal and optimal operation conditions. Good apparent recovery values (78-124%) were obtained for most of the analytes in Milli-Q water, except for 4-tert-octylphenol (4-tOP), which showed apparent recovery values exceeding 100%. Precision (n = 4) was in the 2-27%, and method detection limits were in the low nanogrammes per litre level for most of the analytes studied. The matrix effect was studied using two different approaches. On the one hand, Milli-Q water samples were spiked with humic acids, and apparent recovery values were studied with and without correction with the corresponding deuterated analogue. On the other hand, estuarine water and wastewater samples were spiked with known concentrations of target analytes, and apparent recoveries were studied as explained above. In general, the matrix effect could be corrected with the use of deuterated analogues, except for 4-tOP and nonylphenols for which [~2H _4]-n-nonylphenol did not provide good corrections.
机译:环境水样品中有机污染物的分析需要进行预浓缩步骤。预浓缩技术(例如搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE))已广受欢迎,因为它们可最大限度减少有毒有机溶剂的使用,并且可以视为绿色分析技术。与其他预浓缩技术类似,使用SBSE时的问题之一是基质效应,该效应通常在分析环境水样(例如河口或废水样)时发生。本工作研究了SBSE与管内衍生化-热脱附(TD)-气相色谱-质谱联用的基质效应,用于测定环境水中的几种内分泌干扰物,例如烷基酚,双酚A,雌激素和固醇。样品经过优化后影响确定的主要变量。在SBSE优化过程中,研究了诸如在供体相中添加甲醇或惰性盐,萃取温度,供体相体积,搅拌速率和萃取时间等变量。在管内衍生和TD步骤的情况下,衍生试剂的体积(N,O-双(三甲基甲硅烷基)三氟乙酰胺与1%的三甲基氯硅烷(BSTFA + 1%TMCS))和冷冻聚焦温度是固定的(分别为2μL和-50°C)根据最大信号和最佳操作条件之间的共识。除了4-叔辛基苯酚(4-tOP)的表观回收率超过100%外,Milli-Q水中的大多数分析物均获得了良好的表观回收率(78-124%)。对于大多数研究的分析物,精密度(n = 4)为2-27%,方法检测极限为低纳克每升水平。使用两种不同的方法研究了基质效应。一方面,将Milli-Q水样品中掺入腐殖酸,然后使用相应的氘代类似物对有无校正的表观回收率值进行研究。另一方面,河口水和废水样品中掺入了已知浓度的目标分析物,并且如上所述对表观回收率进行了研究。通常,可以使用氘代类似物来校正基质效应,除了4-tOP和壬基酚(对于[〜2H _4]-正壬基酚没有很好的校正作用)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号