首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Letters >MICROWAVE-ASSISTED SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF MELAMINE FROM SEAFOOD AND DETERMINATION BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY: OPTIMIZATION BY FACTORIAL DESIGN
【24h】

MICROWAVE-ASSISTED SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF MELAMINE FROM SEAFOOD AND DETERMINATION BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY: OPTIMIZATION BY FACTORIAL DESIGN

机译:微波辅助萃取海产三聚氰胺中的溶剂并通过气相色谱-质谱法测定:因子设计法优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Melamine attracts considerable attention because of its toxicity. The determination of melamine in seafood was performed by gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry, using an optimized version of a method adopted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The melamine was extracted by closed-vessel microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MAE), as a valid alternative in sample preparation, to reduce analysis time and provide less ambiguous data. The procedure was optimized by means of experimental factorial design considering the three main variables that affect this process: microwave oven power, the maximum temperature inside the extraction tube, and the hold time. The recovery of melamine in spiked samples was used as the elemental response value of the design. Temperature and hold time had a more positive effect on the response than the microwave power. A significant positive interaction was observed between oven power and hold time. A temperature of 70℃ and a hold time of 1 min gave a recovery of 92±5% for a microwave power of 600 W. Under these conditions, the total microwave extraction time was approximately 2 minutes, a much shorter time compared to the ultrasonic bath, which required a total time of 40 min. The repeatability of the method was approximately 3%. The limits of quantification were 0.55 mg kg~(-1) for MAE and 1.9 mg kg~(-1) for the ultrasonic bath; the linearity was confirmed up to 10 mg kg~(-1). In conclusion, the MAE procedure was shown to be an excellent alternative to the official method.
机译:三聚氰胺由于其毒性而备受关注。使用美国食品药品监督管理局采用的优化方法,通过气相色谱-质谱法测定海鲜中的三聚氰胺。三聚氰胺是通过封闭容器微波辅助溶剂萃取(MAE)萃取的,这是样品制备中的有效替代方法,以减少分析时间并减少模棱两可的数据。考虑到影响该过程的三个主要变量,通过实验性因子设计优化了该过程:微波炉功率,提取管内部的最高温度和保持时间。加标样品中三聚氰胺的回收率用作设计的元素响应值。温度和保持时间对响应的影响比微波功率更积极。在烤箱功率和保持时间之间观察到显着的正相互作用。温度为70℃,保温时间为1分钟,微波功率为600 W时,回收率为92±5%。在这些条件下,总微波提取时间约为2分钟,与超声波相比要短得多浴,总共需要40分钟。该方法的重复性约为3%。 MAE的定量限为0.55 mg kg〜(-1),超声波浴的定量限为1.9 mg kg〜(-1)。线性度最高可达10 mg kg〜(-1)。总之,MAE程序被证明是替代官方方法的绝佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号