首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy for Sustainable Development >Abundance, movements and biodiversity of flying predatory insects in crop and non-crop agroecosystems
【24h】

Abundance, movements and biodiversity of flying predatory insects in crop and non-crop agroecosystems

机译:作物和非作物农业生态系统中飞行的捕食性昆虫的丰度,运动和生物多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Predatory insects are key natural enemies that can highly reduce crops pest damage. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the movements of flying predatory insects in agroecosystems throughout the year. In particular, it is still unclear how these predators move from crop to non-crop habitats, which are the preferred habitats to overwinter and to spread during the spring and if these predators leave or stay after chemical treatments. Here, the Neuroptera, a generalist, highly mobile, flying predator order of insects, was selected as model. We studied the effects of farming management and the efficiency of edge shelterbelts, ground cover vegetation, and fruit trees canopy on holding flying predatory insects in Mediterranean traditional agroecosystems. Seasonal movements and winter effects were also assessed. We evaluated monthly nine fruit agroecosystems, six organic, and three pesticides sprayed, of 0.5-1 ha in eastern Spain during 3 years using two complementary methods, yellow sticky traps and aspirator. Results show surprisingly that the insect abundance was highest in pesticide sprayed systems, with 3.40 insects/sample versus 2.32 insects/sample in organic systems. The biodiversity indices were highest in agroecosystems conducted under organic management, with S of 4.68 and D of 2.34. Shelterbelts showed highest biodiversity indices, S of 3.27 and D of 1.93, among insect habitats. Insect species whose adults were active during the winter preferred fruit trees to spend all year round. However, numerous species moved from fruit trees to shelterbelts to overwinter and dispersed into the orchard during the following spring. The ground cover vegetation showed statistically much lower attractiveness for flying predatory insects than other habitats. Shelterbelts should therefore be the first option in terms of investment in ecological infrastructures enhancing flying predators.
机译:捕食性昆虫是可以大大减少农作物害虫危害的主要天敌。然而,全年缺乏对农业生态系统中飞行的掠食性昆虫运动的知识。特别是,目前尚不清楚这些捕食者如何从作物生境迁移到非作物生境,这些生境是春季越冬和扩散的首选生境,以及这些食肉动物是否经过化学处理后离开或停留。在这里,选择了全能,高度移动,飞行的捕食者阶的Neuroptera作为模型。我们研究了耕作管理的影响以及边缘防护林带,地被植物和果树冠层对保持地中海传统农业生态系统中捕食性捕食性昆虫的影响。还评估了季节性运动和冬季影响。我们使用两种互补的方法,黄色粘性诱集器和吸气器,对西班牙东部在3年内每月0.5-1公顷的九种水果农业生态系统,六种有机农药和三种喷雾农药进行了评估。结果出乎意料地表明,在农药喷洒系统中,昆虫的丰度最高,有机系统为3.40个昆虫/样品,而​​有机系统为2.32个昆虫/样品。在有机管理下进行的农业生态系统中,生物多样性指数最高,S为4.68,D为2.34。在昆虫栖息地中,防护林的生物多样性指数最高,S为3.27,D为1.93。成年人在冬季活跃的昆虫物种更喜欢一年四季花果树。然而,在接下来的春天,许多物种从果树移至防护林,越冬并散布到果园中。与其他生境相比,地表植被对飞行掠食性昆虫的吸引力在统计学上要低得多。因此,在对生态基础设施进行投资以增强飞行掠食者方面,防护林应该是第一选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号