Persistent Organic Pollutants - Are Our Methods Sensitive and Selective Enough?

摘要

Due to the exponential growth of the world population and a strong worldwide economic development, humans are increasingly exposed to chemicals. This is particularly true for persistent, toxic chemicals that accumulate in organisms including humans. The presence of these persistent organic pollutants (POPs) has been reported since the 1960s. Analytical methods developed for the determination of POPs in wildlife, food, feed, sediments, dust, air, and humans have seen a tremendous improvement in sensitivity and selectivity. Detection limits of 0.1 mg/kg for pesticides in the 1960s have decreased down to < 0.1 ng/kg for dioxins presently. On the other hand, due to new toxicological insights, authorities nowadays often demand much lower detection limits than in the early days of discovery. This paper compares the lowest effectual levels of a number of POPs with the analytical capabilities of modern laboratories in terms of sensitivity and selectivity. Methods discussed are gas chromatography (GC), including multi-dimensional GC and liquid chromatography (LC), combined with electron capture detection (for GC) or with different mass spectrometric detectors. The conclusion is that the still improving sensitivity of current methods is sufficient to allow detection of POPs at a level clearly below the lowest observable adverse effect levels. Selectivity has also improved, but given the high complexity of some of the POPs and the multitude of POPs and other chemicals to which we are exposed, further developments in selectivity are still badly needed. To limit and focus the information for regulators, an effect-directed analysis is proposed as an alternative approach.