...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Prediction of spatiotemporal stability and rainfall threshold of shallow landslides using the TRIGRS and Scoops3D models
【24h】

Prediction of spatiotemporal stability and rainfall threshold of shallow landslides using the TRIGRS and Scoops3D models

机译:使用Trigrs和Scoops3D模型预测浅层滑坡的时空稳定性和降雨阈值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The stability evaluation of rainfall-induced landslides using a physical determination model supports disaster prevention, but it is mostly applied to the area with few landslides, and there is a lack of quantitative study on rainfall and landslide stability. This paper combined the Scoops3D model with the TRIGRS model (3D) to predict the shallow landslide spatiotemporal distribution and compared the simulation results with those of the TRIGRS model alone (1D), aiming to obtain more accurate assessment results. At the same time, the relationship between landslide stability and accumulative rainfall was quantitatively fitted to improve the real-time landslide prediction system. We applied the 1D and 3D models to the July 21, 2013 group-occurring landslide event (976 shallow landslides) in the Niangniangba basin, China. The required geotechnical parameters of both models were acquired by field and laboratory tests. We calculated the pressure head over time using the TRIGRS model based on practical rainfall data and predicted the shallow landslide stability using the Scoops3D model according to the resulting piezometric surface. We compared the landslide stability spatial distributions of the two models under initial and saturated conditions with the landslide catalogue. The success rate of landslides predicted by 3D model is 4.20% higher than 1D model. A composite index to quantitatively evaluate both models' performances indicates over-prediction by the 1D model in the stable region, while the 3D model more effectively predicts shallow landslides with a smaller unstable region. The relationship between instability proportion and accumulative rainfall in the 1D and 3D model can be represented by y = 24.57x(0.)(18) and y = 11.59x(0.33), respectively. The 3D model shows more conservative result, and the rainfall threshold analysis proposed in this paper can provide reference for the time of most landslides in the case of insufficient data, which is an important indicator for disaster early warning and prediction.
机译:利用物理确定模型对降雨诱发的滑坡进行稳定性评价有助于防灾,但大多应用于滑坡较少的地区,缺乏对降雨和滑坡稳定性的定量研究。本文将Scoops3D模型与TRIGRS模型(3D)相结合,预测浅层滑坡的时空分布,并将模拟结果与TRIGRS模型(1D)进行比较,以获得更准确的评价结果。同时,对滑坡稳定性与累积降雨量之间的关系进行了定量拟合,以改进滑坡实时预报系统。我们将一维和三维模型应用于2013年7月21日发生在中国娘娘坝盆地的一组滑坡事件(976处浅层滑坡)。通过现场和实验室试验获得了两个模型所需的岩土参数。根据实际降雨数据,我们使用TRIGRS模型计算了一段时间内的压头,并根据得到的测压面,使用Scoops3D模型预测了浅层滑坡的稳定性。我们将两个模型在初始和饱和条件下的滑坡稳定性空间分布与滑坡目录进行了比较。三维模型预测滑坡的成功率比一维模型高4.20%。定量评估两种模型性能的综合指数表明,一维模型在稳定区域的预测过高,而三维模型更有效地预测了不稳定区域较小的浅层滑坡。在一维和三维模型中,不稳定比例与累积降雨量之间的关系可用y=24.57x(0)表示(18) y=11.59x(0.33)。三维模型显示出更保守的结果,本文提出的降雨阈值分析可以在数据不足的情况下为大多数滑坡的时间提供参考,这是灾害预警和预测的重要指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号