首页> 外文期刊>Canadian pharmacists journal: CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC >A prototype for evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions to promote physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing
【24h】

A prototype for evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions to promote physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing

机译:基于证据的药物意见的原型,以促进贬低剥夺的医师 - 药剂师沟通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Interprofessional communication is an effective mechanism for reducing inappropriate prescriptions among older adults. Physicians'views about which elements are essential for pharmacists to include in an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion for deprescribing remain unknown. Objective: To develop a prototype for an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion that promotes physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing. Methods: A standardized template for an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion was developed with input from a convenience sample of 32 primary care physicians and 61 primary care pharmacists, recruited from conferences and community settings in Montreal, Canada. Participants were asked to comment on the need for clarifying treatment goals, including personalized patient data and biomarkers, highlighting evidence about drug harms, listing the credibility and source of the recommendations, providing therapeutic alternatives and formalizing official documentation of decision making. The content and format of the prototype underwent revision by community physicians and pharmacists until consensus was reached on a final recommended template. Results: The majority of physicians (84%-97%) requested that the source of the deprescribing recommendations be cited, that alternative management options be provided and that the information be tailored to the patient. Sixteen percent of physicians expressed concern about the information in the opinions being too dense. Pharmacists also questioned the length of the opinion and asked that additional space be provided for the physician's response. A statement was added making the opinion a valid prescription upon receipt of a signature from physicians. Compared to a nonstandardized opinion, the majority of pharmacists believed the template was easier to use, more evidence based, more time efficient and more likely to lead to deprescribing. Conclusion: Physicians and pharmacists endorsed a standardized template that promotes interprofessional communication for deprescribing (available at https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/pharm aceutical-opinions). The outcome of the D-Prescribe trial will determine the effectiveness of these evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions on deprescribing processes and outcomes.
机译:背景:跨专业沟通是减少老年人不恰当处方的有效机制。医生们对于药剂师在基于证据的药物意见中纳入哪些要素是必要的看法尚不清楚。目的:开发一个循证药学意见的原型,以促进医生与药剂师围绕药物描述进行沟通。方法:从加拿大蒙特利尔的会议和社区环境中招募32名初级保健医生和61名初级保健药剂师,通过便利样本的输入,开发循证药学意见的标准化模板。参与者被要求就澄清治疗目标的必要性发表评论,包括个性化的患者数据和生物标记物,强调药物危害的证据,列出建议的可信度和来源,提供治疗替代方案,以及正式制定决策文件。社区医生和药剂师对原型的内容和格式进行了修订,直到就最终推荐的模板达成共识。结果:大多数医生(84%-97%)要求引用不推荐建议的来源,提供替代管理选项,并根据患者定制信息。16%的医生表示担心意见中的信息过于密集。药剂师还质疑意见的长度,并要求为医生的回答提供额外的空间。增加了一份声明,在收到医生签名后,将该意见视为有效处方。与非标准意见相比,大多数药剂师认为该模板更易于使用、更基于证据、更具时间效率,并且更有可能导致不推荐。结论:医生和药剂师认可了一个标准化的模板,该模板可促进跨专业沟通,以减少药物滥用(可在https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/pharm药剂学意见)。D-Prescripte试验的结果将决定这些循证药物意见对减记过程和结果的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号