...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >Comparison between single-agent and combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis
【24h】

Comparison between single-agent and combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

机译:单药剂和组合化疗与高级非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的比较:多制度回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose Doublet combination chemotherapy is commonly considered a second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy between combination and mono-therapy after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 335 patients who received second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Treatment-free interval (TFI) was used for further stratification analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. Results Two hundred and fifty-three patients received doublet combination chemotherapy and 82 received single-agent chemotherapy. PFS was significantly prolonged in combination group compared to single-agent group (median 5.70 vs 3.70 months; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45-0.85;p = 6 months, PFS and OS of the combination group were significantly increased than the single-agent group (median PFS, 6.67 vs. 3.80 months,p = 0.002; median OS, 13.60 vs. 11.45 months,p = 0.013). Grade III/IV toxicity was similar between the two groups (p = 0.113). Through multivariate analyses, we found that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (p = 6 months.
机译:目的双重联合化疗在中国被普遍认为是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的二线治疗方法。这项多机构回顾性分析评估和比较了中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者铂类一线化疗后联合治疗和单药治疗的疗效。方法回顾性分析335例晚期非小细胞肺癌二线化疗患者的临床资料。主要终点是总生存率(OS),次要终点是无进展生存率(PFS)、有效率(RR)和毒性。无治疗间隔(TFI)用于进一步分层分析。Cox比例风险模型用于多变量分析。结果253例患者接受双重联合化疗,82例患者接受单药化疗。与单药组相比,联合用药组的PFS显著延长(中位PFS为6.67 vs.3.80个月,p=0.002;中位OS为13.60 vs.11.45个月,p=0.013)。两组的III/IV级毒性相似(p=0.113)。通过多变量分析,我们发现东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分(p=6个月)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Yantai YuHuangDing Hosp Dept Radiotherapy Yantai Shandong Peoples R China;

    Shandong First Med Univ &

    Shandong Acad Med Sci Dept Oncol Affiliated Hosp Shandong Acad Med Sci;

    Changqing Dist Peoples Hosp Dept Oncol Jinan Shandong Peoples R China;

    Jinan Iron &

    Steel Grp Ltd Co Dept Oncol Gen Hosp Jinan Shandong Peoples R China;

    Taishan Med Coll Dept Oncol Affiliated Hosp Tai An Shandong Peoples R China;

    Peoples Hosp Yuncheng Dept Oncol Heze Shandong Peoples R China;

    Peoples Hosp Zhangqiu Dept Oncol Jinan Shandong Peoples R China;

    Shandong First Med Univ &

    Shandong Acad Med Sci Dept Oncol Shandong Canc Hosp &

    Inst 440 Jiyan;

    Shandong First Med Univ &

    Shandong Acad Med Sci Dept Oncol Shandong Canc Hosp &

    Inst 440 Jiyan;

    Shandong First Med Univ &

    Shandong Acad Med Sci Basic Lab Dept Oncol Lab Shandong Canc Hosp &

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药理学;
  • 关键词

    Non-small cell lung cancer; Second-line chemotherapy; Mono-therapy; Combination; Efficacy;

    机译:非小细胞肺癌;二线化疗;单疗法;组合;疗效;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号