首页> 外文期刊>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. >A phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX04 to reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States, the European Union, and China in healthy Chinese male volunteers
【24h】

A phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX04 to reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States, the European Union, and China in healthy Chinese male volunteers

机译:第1期随机研究比较HLX04的药代动力学,安全性和免疫原性,以参考来自美国,欧洲联盟和中国健康中国男性志愿者的贝伐单抗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety and immunogenicity of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar HLX04 with reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males. Methods In this double-blind Phase 1 study, healthy volunteers (N = 208) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a single 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion of HLX04 or reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States (bevacizumab-US), the European Union (bevacizumab-EU) or China (bevacizumab-CN). Co-primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time profile (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) and from zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)). Secondary endpoint was the maximum serum drug concentration (C-max). Study participants were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and samples were collected for anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing throughout the study. Results Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar across groups. The respective geometric least-squares mean ratios (GLSMR) of AUC(0-inf), AUC(last) and C-max were: 95.7%, 96.0% and 101.8% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-US; 94.3%, 94.6% and 100.5% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-EU; and 90.0%, 90.4% and 98.2% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-CN. For all test-to-reference comparisons, two-sided 90% confidence intervals of GLSMR for AUC(0-inf), AUC(last) and C-max fell in the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80-125%). There were no notable differences in the frequency, nature and/or grade of TEAEs. No deaths were reported and no ADAs were detected during the study. Conclusion HLX04 had similar safety and pharmacokinetic profiles to reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males, supporting the confirmatory Phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety equivalence between HLX04 and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT03511963).
机译:目的比较拟用贝伐单抗生物仿制药HLX04与参考贝伐单抗在健康中国男性体内的药代动力学特征、安全性和免疫原性。方法在这项双盲1期研究中,健康志愿者(N=208)按1:1:1:1的比例随机接受单次3mg/kg的HLX04静脉滴注或来自美国(贝伐单抗美国)、欧盟(贝伐单抗欧盟)或中国(贝伐单抗CN)的贝伐单抗参考。共同主要终点是从时间零点外推到无穷大(AUC(0-inf))和从零到最后一个可量化浓度(AUC(last))的血清浓度-时间曲线(AUC)下的面积。次要终点是最大血清药物浓度(C-max)。在整个研究过程中,对研究参与者进行治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)监测,并收集样本进行抗药物抗体(ADA)检测。结果各组药代动力学参数相似。AUC(0-inf)、AUC(last)和C-max的几何最小二乘平均比(GLSMR)分别为:HLX04组与贝伐单抗组的95.7%、96.0%和101.8%;HLX04组与贝伐单抗组相比分别为94.3%、94.6%和100.5%;HLX04组与贝伐单抗CN组相比分别为90.0%、90.4%和98.2%。对于所有试验对照比较,AUC(0-inf)、AUC(last)和C-max的GLSMR双侧90%置信区间均在预先规定的生物等效性范围内(80-125%)。TEAE的频率、性质和/或等级没有显著差异。研究期间未报告死亡病例,也未检测到ADA。结论HLX04在健康中国男性中的安全性和药代动力学特征与贝伐单抗相似,支持了研究HLX04和贝伐单抗在转移性结直肠癌患者中的疗效和安全性等效性的3期验证性研究(NCT03511963)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号