首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference is a poor tool to predict adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
【24h】

Central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference is a poor tool to predict adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study

机译:中央静脉对动脉二氧化碳差异是一种可怜的工具,可以预测心脏手术后不良结果:回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (CO2 gap) has been reported to be a sensitive indicator of cardiac output adequacy. We aimed to assess whether the CO2 gap can predict postoperative adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 5,151 patients from our departmental database who underwent cardiac surgery from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Lactate level (mmol center dot L-1), central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) (%), and the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (CO2 gap) were measured at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and on days 1 and 2 after cardiac surgery. The following postoperative adverse outcomes were collected: ICU mortality, hemopericardium or tamponade, resuscitated cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, acute hepatic failure, mesenteric ischemia, and pneumonia. The primary outcome was the presence of at least one postoperative adverse outcome. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between ScVO2, lactate, and the CO2 gap with adverse outcomes. Their diagnostic performance was compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results There were 1,933 patients (38%) with an adverse outcome. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) parameters were similar between groups. The CO2 gap was slightly higher for the "adverse outcomes" group than for the "no adverse outcomes" group. Arterial lactate at admission, day 1, and day 2 was also slightly higher in patients with adverse outcomes. Central venous oxygen saturation was not significantly different between patients with and without adverse outcomes. The area under the ROC curve to predict outcomes after CPB for the CO2 gap at admission, day 1, and day 2 were 0.52, 0.55, and 0.53, respectively. Conclusion After cardiac surgery with CPB, the CO2 gap at ICU admission, day 1, and day 2 was associated with postoperative adverse outcomes but showed poor diagnostic performance.
机译:目的静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(CO2 gap)已被报道为心输出量充足性的敏感指标。我们的目的是评估CO2间隙是否可以预测心脏手术后的不良后果。方法对我们科室数据库中2008年1月1日至2018年12月31日接受心脏手术的5151例患者进行回顾性研究。在重症监护病房(ICU)入院时,以及心脏手术后第1天和第2天,测量乳酸水平(mmol center dot L-1)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScVO2)(%)和静脉-动脉二氧化碳差值(CO2 gap)。收集以下术后不良结果:ICU死亡率、心包积血或心包填塞、心脏骤停复苏、急性肾损伤、大出血、急性肝衰竭、肠系膜缺血和肺炎。主要结果是至少出现一种术后不良结果。Logistic回归用于评估ScVO2、乳酸和CO2间隙与不良后果之间的相关性。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线比较其诊断性能。结果1933例(38%)出现不良反应。两组的体外循环(CPB)参数相似。“不良结果”组的二氧化碳差距略高于“无不良结果”组。在有不良结局的患者中,入院时、第1天和第2天的动脉乳酸也略高。有和无不良结局的患者的中心静脉血氧饱和度没有显著差异。在入院时、第1天和第2天,预测CPB后CO2间隙结果的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.52、0.55和0.53。结论CPB心脏手术后,ICU入院时、第1天和第2天的CO2间隙与术后不良结局相关,但诊断性能较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号