...
首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >Long term cardiovascular impacts after burn and non-burn trauma: A comparative population-based study
【24h】

Long term cardiovascular impacts after burn and non-burn trauma: A comparative population-based study

机译:燃烧和非烧伤创伤后的长期心血管影响:基于比较的人群的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Burns and other trauma are associated with increased post-injury CVD admissions. ? Incident IHD admissions for 5 years after burns and 6 months for other trauma. ? Different effects on incident heart failure admissions for burns and other trauma. ? Different effects on incident cerebrovascular admissions for burns and other trauma. Abstract Objective To compare post-injury cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospital admissions experienced by burn patients with non-burn trauma patients and people with no record of injury, adjusting for socio-demographic, health and injury factors. Methods Linked hospital and death data were analysed for a cohort of burn patients (n=30,997) hospitalised in Western Australia during the period 1980–2012 and age and gender frequency matched comparison cohorts (non-burn trauma: n=28,647; non-injured: n=123,399). The number and length of hospital stay for CVD admissions were used as outcome measures. Multivariate negative binomial regression was used to derive adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Multivariate Cox regression models and hazard ratios (HR) were used to examine first time post-injury CVD admissions. Results The burn cohort had a higher rate of CVD (combined) admissions (IRR, 95%CI: 1.16: 1.08–1.24) and spent longer in hospital (IRR, 95%CI: 1.37, 1.13–1.66) than the non-burn trauma cohort. Both the burn cohort (IRR, 95%CI: 1.50, 1.40–1.60) and the non-burn trauma cohort (IRR, 95%CI: 1.29, 1.21–1.37) had higher adjusted rates of post-injury CVD admissions compared with the non-injured cohort. The burn cohort (HR, 95%CI: 2.27, 1.70–3.02) and non-burn trauma cohort (HR, 95%CI: 2.19, 1.66–2.87) experienced significantly elevated first time CVD admissions during the first 6 months after injury, decreasing in magnitude from 6 months to 5 years after injury (HR, 95%CI: burn vs. non-injured; 1.31, 1.16–1.48; non-burn trauma vs. non-injured; 1.16, 1.03–1.31); no significant difference in incident admission rates was found beyond 5 years (HR, 95%CI: burn vs. non-injured; 0.99, 0.92–1.07; non-burn trauma vs. non-injured; 1.00, 0.93–1.07). Conclusions Burn and non-burn trauma patients experience elevated rates of post-injury CVD admissions for a prolonged period after the initial injury and are particularly at increased risk of incident CVD admissions during the first 5-years after the injury event. Detailed clinical data are required to help understand the underlying pathogenic pathways triggered by burn and non-burn trauma. This study identified treatment needs for injury patients, burn and non-burn, for a prolonged period after discharge.
机译:亮点?烧伤和其他创伤与受伤后CVD入院人数增加有关?烧伤后5年和其他创伤6个月内的IHD住院事件?烧伤和其他创伤对突发性心力衰竭入院的不同影响?烧伤和其他创伤对意外脑血管入院的不同影响。摘要目的比较烧伤患者、非烧伤创伤患者和无受伤记录者受伤后心血管疾病(CVD)住院情况,调整社会人口统计学、健康和受伤因素。方法对1980年至2012年期间在西澳大利亚州住院的烧伤患者队列(n=30997)以及年龄和性别频率匹配的对照队列(非烧伤创伤:n=28647;非受伤:n=123399)的相关医院和死亡数据进行分析。CVD入院患者的住院次数和住院时间被用作结果衡量指标。多元负二项回归用于推导调整后的发病率比(IRR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。多变量Cox回归模型和危险比(HR)用于检查首次损伤后CVD入院情况。结果烧伤组CVD(合并)入院率(IRR,95%CI:1.16:1.08–1.24)和住院时间(IRR,95%CI:1.37,1.13–1.66)高于非烧伤创伤组。烧伤组(IRR,95%可信区间:1.50,1.40–1.60)和非烧伤创伤组(IRR,95%可信区间:1.29,1.21–1.37)的受伤后CVD入院调整率均高于非受伤组。烧伤组(HR,95%可信区间:2.27,1.70–3.02)和非烧伤创伤组(HR,95%可信区间:2.19,1.66–2.87)在受伤后的前6个月内首次出现心血管疾病的人数显著增加,从受伤后的6个月到5年下降(HR,95%可信区间:烧伤与非受伤;1.31,1.16–1.48;非烧伤创伤与非受伤;1.16,1.03–1.31);5年后,未发现事件入院率有显著差异(HR,95%置信区间:烧伤与非受伤;0.99,0.92–1.07;非烧伤创伤与非受伤;1.00,0.93–1.07)。结论烧伤和非烧伤创伤患者在初次受伤后的很长一段时间内,受伤后CVD入院率升高,尤其是在受伤事件发生后的前5年,意外CVD入院的风险增加。需要详细的临床数据来帮助理解烧伤和非烧伤创伤引发的潜在致病途径。这项研究确定了烧伤和非烧伤患者出院后长时间的治疗需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号