...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Absolute Location of 2019 Ridgecrest Seismicity Reveals a Shallow M-w 7.1 Hypocenter, Migrating and Pulsing M-w 7.1 Foreshocks, and Duplex M-w 6.4 Ruptures
【24h】

Absolute Location of 2019 Ridgecrest Seismicity Reveals a Shallow M-w 7.1 Hypocenter, Migrating and Pulsing M-w 7.1 Foreshocks, and Duplex M-w 6.4 Ruptures

机译:2019年ridgeCrest地震性的绝对位置揭示了一个浅M-W 7.1次级,迁移和脉冲M-W 7.1的损伤,并且双工M-W 6.4破裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 2019 Ridgecrest, California, sequence includes an M-w 6.4 earthquake on 4 July and an M-w 7.1 mainshock 34 hr later. We perform absolute location of M-w >= 1.0 Ridgecrest events using multiple velocity models, station corrections, and a location algorithm robust to velocity model and arrival-time error. The obtained seismicity is mainly similar to 3-12 km deep, with few shallower events. The M-w 6.4 hypocenter is similar to 12 km deep, compatible with hypocentral depths of most M-w >= 6 earthquakes in southern California. The M-w 7.1 hypocenter, however, is unusually shallow at similar to 4 km. The immediate post-M-w 6.4 seismicity defines a deep, similar to 12 km long, southeast-northwest structure containing the M-w 6.4 hypocenter and a shallower, orthogonal, similar to 18 km long northeast-southwest structure. These structures have little or no intersection, making the M-w 6.4 event a double earthquake, rupturing first the deeper and then the shallower structure. The ensuing, pre-M-w 7.1 seismicity extends the southeastnorthwest structure northwestwards to within similar to 3 km of the future M-w 7.1 hypocenter and illuminates a new crossing structure, whereas small clusters of events within 2 km of the future M-w 7.1 hypocenter activate 3-4 times in pulses from a few hours after the M-w 6.4 event through M-w 7.1 initiation. This pre-M-w 7.1 seismicity suggests M-w 7.1 rupture initiation activated as an event in the pulsing clusters, and early M-w 7.1 rupture growth was primed by stress changes from the M-w 6.4 rupture and its aftershocks. Moreover, shallow M-w 7.1 nucleation, for which spontaneous rupture growth into a large earthquake is not expected, may have required this incitation by the M-w 6.4 events, a significant complication for hazard estimation. Otherwise, M-w 7.1-like rupture might not have occurred until much later, perhaps with nucleation at greater depth. The Ridgecrest seismicity defines additional structures around and crossing the main M-w 6.4 and 7.1 rupture zones, but some of this seismicity likely shows delayed activity on pre-existing faults due to stress changes from the main events and not rupture complexity during the larger events.
机译:2019年加利福尼亚州Ridgecrest地震序列包括7月4日的一次M-w 6.4级地震和34小时后的一次M-w 7.1级主震。我们使用多个速度模型、台站校正和对速度模型和到达时间误差鲁棒的定位算法,对M-w>=1.0脊峰事件进行绝对定位。获得的地震活动主要类似于3-12km深,很少有浅层事件。M-w 6.4震源类似于12公里深,与南加州大多数M-w>=6地震的震源深度一致。然而,M-w 7.1震源异常浅,大约4公里。M-w 6.4地震后的直接地震活动定义了一个深的、类似于12 km长的东南-西北结构,包含M-w 6.4震源和一个浅的、正交的、类似于18 km长的东北-西南结构。这些结构几乎没有交叉点,使M-w 6.4事件成为一场双重地震,先是较深的结构断裂,然后是较浅的结构断裂。随后,M-w 7.1之前的地震活动将东南-西北结构向西北方向延伸至距离未来M-w 7.1震源3公里以内,并照亮了一个新的交叉结构,而距离未来M-w 7.1震源2公里以内的小事件群从M-w 6.4事件发生后几小时到M-w 7.1触发,以脉冲方式激活3-4次。这一M-w 7.1之前的地震活动表明,M-w 7.1破裂起始作为脉冲群中的一个事件被激活,早期M-w 7.1破裂增长是由M-w 6.4破裂及其余震的应力变化引发的。此外,浅层M-w 7.1成核可能需要M-w 6.4事件的激发,这是危险评估的一个重要复杂因素,而对于浅层M-w 7.1成核,预计不会自发破裂发展为大地震。否则,M-w 7.1型断裂可能直到很久以后才发生,可能是在更大的深度处成核。脊脊地震活动定义了主要M-w 6.4和7.1断裂带周围和交叉的其他结构,但由于主要事件的应力变化,而非更大事件期间的断裂复杂性,一些地震活动可能显示出预先存在的断层上的延迟活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号