首页> 外文期刊>British journal of sports medicine >Physical activity is good for older adults—but is programme implementation being overlooked? A systematic review of intervention studies that reported frameworks or measures of implementation
【24h】

Physical activity is good for older adults—but is programme implementation being overlooked? A systematic review of intervention studies that reported frameworks or measures of implementation

机译:身体活动对于老年人来说是良好的 - 但是计划实施被忽视了? 关于框架或实施措施的干预研究的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To examine older adult physical activity (PA) intervention studies that evaluated implementation and/or scale-up. Research question 1: What implementation and/or scale-up indicators (specific, observable and measurable characteristics that show the progress of implementation) were reported? Research question 2: What implementation and/or scale-up frameworks were reported? Research question 3: Did studies evaluate the relationship between implementation or scale-up of the intervention and individual level health/behaviour outcomes? If yes, how?Systematic review.Publications from electronic databases and hand searches (2000 to December 2019).Any PA intervention studies with community-dwelling older adult participants (mean age ≥60 years). Required indicators: (a) Must report amount of PA as an outcome, with validated self-report or objective measures, and (b) Must have reported at least one implementation or scale-up framework and/or one implementation or scale-up indicator.137 studies were included for research question 1, 11 for question 2 and 22 for question 3. 137 studies reported an implementation indicator: 14 unique indicators. None were specified as indicators for scale-up evaluation. 11 studies were guided by an implementation or scale-up framework. 22 studies described a relationship between an implementation indicator and an individual-level health outcome.There is need for implementation research that extends beyond analysis at the individual level, includes clearly defined indicators and provides a guiding framework to support PA initiatives in older adults. Such implementation studies should evaluate factors in the broader context (eg,political, environmental) that influence scale-up.
机译:检查评估实施和/或扩大的较老的成人身体活动(PA)干预研究。研究问题1:报告了什么实施和/或扩大指标(具体,可观察和可衡量的特征,显示实施进度)?研究问题2:报告了哪些实施和/或扩展框架?研究问题3:研究是否评估了实施或扩大干预和个人级别健康/行为结果之间的关系?如果是,如何?系统评论。来自电子数据库和手中搜查的公开(2000年至2019年12月)。随着社区住宅的历史参与者(平均年龄≥60岁),Any PA干预研究。所需指标:(a)必须向结果报告PA作为结果,验证的自我报告或客观措施,(b)必须报告至少一个实施或扩大框架和/或一个实施或扩展指标.137题为第2和第22号问题第1,11页的研究包括问题3.137研究报告了一个实施指标:14个独特指标。没有被指定为扩展评估的指标。 11项研究由实施或扩大框架引导。 22研究描述了实现指标与个人级健康结果之间的关系。需要实施研究,这些研究延伸到个人级别的分析,包括明确规定的指标,并提供了一个指导框架,以支持老年人的PA举措。这种实施研究应评估影响扩大的更广泛的背景(例如政治,环境)的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号