首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Haematology >Infections in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases treated with targeted agents: SEIFEM multicentric retrospective study
【24h】

Infections in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases treated with targeted agents: SEIFEM multicentric retrospective study

机译:靶向剂治疗淋巴抑制性疾病患者的感染:SEIFEM多中心回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We describe the opportunistic infections occurring in 362 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders treated with ibrutinib and idelalisib in clinical practice. Overall, 108 of 362 patients (29 center dot 8%) developed infections, for a total of 152 events. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were 49 center dot 3% (75/152) and microbiologically defined infections (MDI) were 50 center dot 7% (77/152). Among 250 patients treated with ibrutinib, 28 center dot 8% (72/250) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 104 episodes. MDI were 49% (51/104). Bacterial infections were 66 center dot 7% (34/51), viral 19 center dot 6% (10/51) and invasive fungal diseases (IFD) 13 center dot 7% (7/51). Among the 112 patients treated with idelalisib, 32 center dot 1% (36/112) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 48 episodes. MDI were 54 center dot 2% (26/48). Bacterial infections were 34 center dot 6% (9/26), viral 61 center dot 5% (16/26) and IFD 3 center dot 8% (1/26). With ibrutinib, the rate of bacterial infections was significantly higher compared to idelalisib (66 center dot 7% vs. 34 center dot 6%;P= 0 center dot 007), while viral infections were most frequent in idelalisib (61 center dot 5% vs. 19 center dot 6%;P< 0 center dot 001). Although a higher rate of IFD was observed in patients treated with ibrutinib, the difference was not statistically significant (13 center dot 7% vs. 3 center dot 8% respectively;P = 0 center dot 18). Bacteria are the most frequent infections with ibrutinib, while viruses are most frequently involved with idelalisib.
机译:我们描述了362例淋巴抑制性疾病患者发生的机会主义感染,在临床实践中治疗伊尔替尔替尼和伊尔替尔替莱替替斯化。总体而言,362名患者中的108名(29个中心点8%)发育感染,共有152个事件。临床定义的感染(CDI)为49个中心点3%(75/152)和微生物学定义的感染(MDI)为50中心点7%(77/152)。在用伊布鲁西布治疗的250名患者中,28个中心点8%(72/250)经历了一种或多种感染,共104个发作。 MDI为49%(51/104)。细菌感染是66中心点7%(34/51),病毒19中心点6%(10/51)和侵入性真菌疾病(IFD)13中心点7%(7/51)。在用Idelalisib治疗的112名患者中,32个中心点1%(36/112)经历了一种或多种感染,共48个发作。 MDI为54中心点2%(26/48)。细菌感染是34中心点6%(9/26),病毒61中心点5%(16/26)和IFD 3中心点8%(1/26)。与Ibrutinib相比,细菌感染率明显高于Idelalisib(66中心点7%与34中心点6%; P = 0中心点007),而病毒感染在Idelalisib中最常见(61中心点5%与19中心点6%; P <0中心点001)。虽然在用伊布勒替尼治疗的患者中观察到IFD的更高速率,但差异没有统计学意义(13个中心点7%与3中心点8%; P = 0中心点18)。细菌是Ibrutinib最常见的感染,而病毒最常涉及Idelalisib。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号