首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Optimization and economic evaluation of integrated natural gas liquids (NGL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing for lean feed gas
【24h】

Optimization and economic evaluation of integrated natural gas liquids (NGL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing for lean feed gas

机译:瘦饲料气体综合天然气液体(NGL)和液化天然气(LNG)加工的优化和经济评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is an increasing demand for economic evaluation of integrated liquefaction and natural gas liquids (NGL) recovery processes for lean feed. This paper performs economic analysis for the conventional liquefied natural gas (LNG) and NGL coproduction process compared to two proposed simple integrated processes considering the LNG higher heating value (HHV) specification under lean feed conditions. Dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) cycle was used for liquefaction in the conventional and one of the proposed processes. Single mixed refrigerant (SMR) cycle was selected for the other simplified proposed process, which has the advantage of lowering capital expenditure compared with the DMR cycle. The process schemes were built by the commercial software Aspen HYSYS, and a genetic algorithm (GA) was used for process optimization. The results show that the first proposed integrated process has economic advantages compared to the conventional scheme under the lean feed composition (which represents different results from previous studies reported under conventional feed conditions). Additionally, capital cost was reduced remarkably by simplifying the NGL recovery section with little loss of liquefaction efficiency. The second proposed process has the lowest capital expenditure and shows best profitability for plants operating for less than 15 months, but the liquefaction efficiency is lower than the other two schemes.
机译:对整合液化和天然气液体(NGL)回收过程的经济评价越来越大,依赖于贫饲料。与考虑瘦饲料条件下的LNG更高的加热值(HHV)规格的两个提出的简单集成工艺相比,本文对传统的液化天然气(LNG)和NGL组合过程进行了经济分析。双混合制冷剂(DMR)循环用于常规和拟议方法之一中的液化。选择单一混合制冷剂(SMR)循环用于其他简化的拟议方法,其具有与DMR循环相比降低资本支出的优点。该过程方案由商业软件Aspen Hysys构建,遗传算法(GA)用于工艺优化。结果表明,与贫饲料组合物下的常规方案相比,第一个拟议的综合过程具有经济优势(其代表在常规饲料条件下报告的先前研究的不同结果)。此外,通过简化液化效率损失几乎没有损失NGL回收部分,可以显着降低资本成本。第二个拟议过程具有最低的资本支出,并显示出不到15个月的植物的最佳盈利能力,但液化效率低于其他两种方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号