首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Heat and mass transfer comparisons of desiccant coated microchannel and fin-and-tube heat exchangers
【24h】

Heat and mass transfer comparisons of desiccant coated microchannel and fin-and-tube heat exchangers

机译:干燥剂涂层微通道和翅片管热交换器的热量和传质比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two types of DCHEs, desiccant coated microchannel heat exchanger (DMHE) and desiccant coated fin-and-tube heat exchanger (DFHE), are manufactured and tested. The heat transfer, mass transfer and pressure drop performances of two DCHEs are analyzed and compared by experimental results. In the same conditions, the heat transfer coefficients of DMHE are almost twice as large as those of DFHE, no matter for sensible heat or latent heat. In dehumidification, the ratios of latent heat to total heat for DFHE and DMHE are 90% and 83%, separately. In regeneration, the ratios of latent heat to total heat for two DCHEs are both approximately 60%. The mass transfer coefficient of DMHE is 15% larger than that of DFHE. The pressure drops per unit transfer area of DMHE is almost 125% larger than that of DFHE. In a conclusion, DMHE shows lower heat capacity, higher heat and mass transfer capacity compared with DFHE.
机译:制造和测试两种类型的薄荷,干燥剂涂覆的微通道热交换器(DMHE)和干燥剂涂覆的翅片管热交换器(DFHE)。 通过实验结果分析和比较两种DCHE的传热,传质和压降性能。 在相同的条件下,DMHE的热传递系数几乎是DFHE的两倍,无论是否有明智的热量或潜热。 在除湿中,潜热的比例与DFHE和DMHE的总热量分别为90%和83%。 在再生中,潜热的比率与两个达氏的总热量约为60%。 DMHE的传质系数比DFHE大的15%。 每单位转移面积的DMHE的压降差计大于DFHE的125%。 在结论中,与DFHE相比,DMHE显示出较低的热容量,更高的热量和传质容量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号