首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Water regulation, crop production, and agricultural water management - understanding farmer perspectives on irrigation efficiency. (Special Issue: Irrigation efficiency and productivity: scales, systems and science.)
【24h】

Water regulation, crop production, and agricultural water management - understanding farmer perspectives on irrigation efficiency. (Special Issue: Irrigation efficiency and productivity: scales, systems and science.)

机译:水资源管理,作物生产和农业用水管理-了解农民对灌溉效率的看法。 (特刊:灌溉效率和生产力:规模,系统和科学。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Irrigated agriculture is facing rising competition worldwide for access to reliable, low cost, high quality water. In England, farmers are under regulatory pressure to improve irrigation efficiency; indeed, demonstrating efficient water use is now a prerequisite for renewing an irrigation abstraction licence (permit). However, there are differences between the concepts of efficient water use as viewed by scientists, regulators and farmers, further confused by the overlap of similar terminology with both precise technical and wider less specific meanings. Most farmers' concepts of water efficiency are linked to maximising the farms' economic productivity rather than saving water per se, except perhaps when their own allocated resources may be inadequate. Using a financial criteria for water efficiency rather than an engineering one appears a sensible approach when assessing irrigation performance at the farm level, since any managerial (e.g. scheduling) and operational (e.g. equipment) inefficiencies associated with irrigation are implicitly included in the assessment. It also allows comparison between individual irrigators (benchmarking) and between different water sectors (e.g. agriculture, leisure, industry). However, estimating the direct financial benefits (value) of water to the farm is only part of the equation; assessing indirect economic benefits, such as the importance of irrigated production to the sustainability of rural communities is equally important, but much harder to achieve. Demonstrating efficient or 'best' use of water is not straightforward, but farmers and the water regulator need a rational approach that reflects the needs of the farming community whilst providing a policy framework for protecting the environment. This paper reviews the concept of irrigation efficiency in a temperate climate, considers the farmer perspectives, and supports using the 'pathway to efficiency' as a means to assist farmers and the water regulator in achieving better irrigation management and abstraction control.
机译:在世界范围内,灌溉农业在获取可靠,低成本,高质量水方面面临日益激烈的竞争。在英格兰,农民承受着提高灌溉效率的监管压力。实际上,证明有效用水现已成为续签灌溉许可(许可证)的先决条件。但是,科学家,监管机构和农民认为有效用水的概念之间存在差异,进一步的混淆是相似术语的重叠以及精确的技术含义和较宽泛的较不具体的含义。大多数农民的用水效率概念与最大化农场的经济生产力联系在一起,而不是节水本身,除非他们自己分配的资源可能不足。在评估农场一级的灌溉绩效时,使用财务标准而不是工程标准似乎是一种明智的方法,因为评估中隐含了与灌溉相关的任何管理效率(例如调度)和运营效率(例如设备)的低效率。它还可以比较各个灌溉设备(基准)和不同水部门(例如农业,休闲,工业)之间的比较。但是,估算给农场带来的直接水利(价值)只是方程式的一部分;评估间接的经济利益,例如灌溉生产对农村社区可持续性的重要性,同样重要,但要实现这一目标要困难得多。证明高效或“最佳”用水是不容易的,但是农民和水管理者需要一种合理的方法,既能反映农业社区的需求,又要提供保护环境的政策框架。本文回顾了温带气候下灌溉效率的概念,考虑了农民的观点,并支持使用“提高效率的途径”作为协助农民和水调节者实现更好的灌溉管理和取水控制的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号