...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Noninvasive calculation of the aortic blood pressure waveform from the flow velocity waveform: a proof of concept
【24h】

Noninvasive calculation of the aortic blood pressure waveform from the flow velocity waveform: a proof of concept

机译:从流速波形的主动脉血压波形的非侵入性计算:概念证明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Estimation of aortic and left ventricular (LV) pressure usually requires measurements that are difficult to acquire during the imaging required to obtain concurrent LV dimensions essential for determination of LV mechanical properties. We describe a novel method for deriving aortic pressure from the aortic flow velocity. The target pressure waveform is divided into an early systolic upstroke, determined by the water hammer equation, and a diastolic decay equal to that in the peripheral arterial tree, interposed by a late systolic portion described by a second-order polynomial constrained by conditions of continuity and conservation of mean arterial pressure. Pulse wave velocity (PWV, which can be obtained through imaging), mean arterial pressure, diastolic pressure, and diastolic decay are required inputs for the algorithm. The algorithm was tested using 1) pressure data derived theoretically from prespecified flow waveforms and properties of the arterial tree using a single-tube 1-D model of the arterial tree, and 2) experimental data acquired from a pressure/Doppler flow velocity transducer placed in the ascending aorta in 18 patients (mean ± SD: age 63 ± 11 yr, aortic BP 136 ± 23/73 ± 13 rnrnHg) at the time of cardiac catheterization. For experimental data, PWV was calculated from measured pressures/flows, and mean and diastolic pressures and diastolic decay were taken from measured pressure (i.e., were assumed to be known). Pressure reconstructed from measured flow agreed well with theoretical pressure: mean ± SD root mean square (RMS) error 0.7 ±0.1 mmHg. Similarly, for experimental data, pressure reconstructed from measured flow agreed well with measured pressure (mean RMS error 2.4 ±1.0 mmHg). First systolic shoulder and systolic peak pressures were also accurately rendered (mean ± SD difference 1.4 ± 2.0 mmHg for peak systolic pressure). This is the first noninvasive derivation of aortic pressure based on fluid dynamics (flow and wave speed) in the aorta itself.
机译:主动脉和左心室(LV)压力的估计通常需要测量,该测量难以在获得的成像期间获得,以获得对LV机械性能的测定必然的同时性LV尺寸。我们描述了一种用于从主动脉速率的衍生主动脉压力的新方法。将目标压力波形分为由水锤方程确定的早期收缩压,并且舒张衰减等于在外周动脉树中的舒张衰减,由由连续性条件由二阶多项式限制描述的晚期收缩部分内插入和守恒平均动脉压。脉冲波速度(通过成像可以获得的PWV),平均动脉压,舒张压和舒张衰减是该算法的输入。使用1)使用1)压力数据从由动脉树的单管1-D模型从预定的流量波形和动脉树的预定流量波形和性质进行测试,以及从压力/多普勒流速换能器获取的实验数据在18名患者中的升压中(平均值±SD:年龄63±11,主动脉BP 136±23/73±13 rnrnhg)。对于实验数据,从测量的压力/流动计算PWV,均从测量的压力取出平均值和舒张压和舒张压衰减(即,已知已知)。从测量的流量重建压力很好地与理论压力很好:平均值±SD根均方(RMS)误差0.7±0.1mmHg。类似地,对于实验数据,从测量的流量重建的压力良好地同意测量的压力(平均rms误差2.4±1.0 mmhg)。首先,还准确地呈现1个收缩肩和收缩峰值压力(平均±SD差1.4±2.0 mmHg用于收缩压)。这是基于主动脉自身的流体动力学(流动和波速)的主动脉压力的第一种非侵入性推导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号