首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Irrigating with arsenic contaminated groundwater in West Bengal and Bangladesh: a review of interventions for mitigating adverse health and crop outcomes.
【24h】

Irrigating with arsenic contaminated groundwater in West Bengal and Bangladesh: a review of interventions for mitigating adverse health and crop outcomes.

机译:西孟加拉邦和孟加拉国的砷污染地下水灌溉:减轻不良健康和作物后果的干预措施的回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a rich body of literature on arsenic (As) contamination of groundwater and its consequences for human health via drinking water. Less is known however, on the impacts that flow from the use of arsenic rich groundwater for irrigation or the effectiveness of arsenic remediation in agricultural systems. To partially fill this gap, we review 29 studies that examine the consequences of irrigating with arsenic contaminated groundwater and 28 studies which evaluate interventions aimed at reducing its negative impacts on human health and crops. These studies are geographically limited to West Bengal and Bangladesh (Bengal plains) as these regions constitute hubs of concerns for groundwater contamination. These studies show that there are six broad categories of interventions: deficit irrigation; soil fertilization; growing alternative field crops (other than paddy); switching to arsenic tolerant paddy cultivars; cooking methods to reduce arsenic content in rice and nutritional supplements. Importantly, these efforts target different stages of the agri-food system, some intervene in production processes and balance concerns for crop yields and human health while others focus on consumption practices and only mitigate health risks. Despite this diversity in focus, our results indicate that all treatments have positive effects, either in reducing As content in grains, its accumulation in soil and/or increase crop yields compared to control groups. However, the extent of these impacts varies as do their implications for long-term agricultural sustainability. From a policy perspective, these interventions offer promising alternatives to the extremes of restricted groundwater use on the one hand, and unregulated extraction on the other, but are yet to be integrated into mainstream extension services.
机译:关于地下水中砷(As)的污染及其通过饮用水对人类健康的影响,已有大量文献。然而,对于使用富含砷的地下水进行灌溉所产生的影响或农业系统中砷的治理效果知之甚少。为了部分弥补这一差距,我们回顾了29篇研究砷污染的地下水灌溉后果的研究,以及28篇评估旨在减少其对人类健康和农作物不利影响的干预措施的研究。这些研究在地理上仅限于西孟加拉邦和孟加拉国(孟加拉平原),因为这些地区构成了关注地下水污染的中心。这些研究表明,干预措施可分为六大类:赤字灌溉;土壤施肥种植替代田间作物(水稻除外);改用耐砷的水稻品种;减少大米和营养补品中砷含量的烹饪方法。重要的是,这些努力针对的是农业食品系统的不同阶段,其中一些干预了生产过程,并平衡了对作物产量和人类健康的关注,而另一些则侧重于消费习惯并仅减轻了健康风险。尽管重点关注的多样性,但我们的结果表明,与对照组相比,所有处理都在减少谷物中As的含量,其在土壤中的积累和/或提高农作物的产量方面具有积极作用。但是,这些影响的程度以及它们对长期农业可持续性的影响也各不相同。从政策的角度来看,这些干预措施一方面提供了极有希望的替代方案,可用于极端限制地下水的使用,另一方面可以提供不受管制的开采,但尚未纳入主流推广服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号