首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Inhibition of ROMK blocks macula densa lubuloglo-merular feedback yet causes renal vasoconstriction in anesthetized rats
【24h】

Inhibition of ROMK blocks macula densa lubuloglo-merular feedback yet causes renal vasoconstriction in anesthetized rats

机译:抑制romk块黄斑黄斑杜兰娜Lubuloglo - 不合因的反馈尚在麻醉大鼠中导致肾血管收缩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Na+-K+-2C1~ cotransporter (NKCC2) on the loop of Henle is the site of action of furosemide. Because outer medullary potassium channel (ROMK) inhibitors prevent reabsorption by NKCC2, we tested the hypothesis that ROMK inhibition with a novel selective ROMK inhibitor (compound C) blocks tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) and reduces vascular resistance. Loop perfusion of either ROMK inhibitor or furosemide caused dose-dependent blunting of TGF, but the response to furosemide was 10-fold more sensitive (IC50 = 10-6 M for furosemide and IC50 = 10-5 M for compound C). During systemic infusion, both diuretics inhibited TGF, but ROMK inhibitor was 10-fold more sensitive (compound C: 63% inhibition; furosemide: 32% inhibition). Despite blockade of TGF, 1 h of constant systemic infusion of both diuretics reduced the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF) by 40-60% and increased renal vascular resistance (RVR) by 100— 200%. Neither diuretic altered blood pressure or hematocrit. Proximal tubule hydrostatic pressures (PpT) increased transiently with both diuretics (compound C: 56% increase; furosemide: 70% increase) but returned to baseline. ROMK inhibitor caused more natriuresis (3,400 vs. 1,600% increase) and calciuresis (1,200 vs. 800% increase) but less kaliuresis (33 vs. 167% increase) than furosemide. In conclusion, blockade of ROMK or Na+-K+-2C1-transport inhibits TGF yet increases renal vascular resistance. The renal vasoconstriction was independent of volume depletion, blood pressure, TGF, or Ppt.
机译:在Henle环路上的Na + -k + -2C1〜Cotroansporter(NKCC2)是呋塞米的动作部位。由于外髓型钾通道(ROMK)抑制剂防止NKCC2重吸收,所以我们测试了ROMK抑制与新型选择性ROMK抑制剂(化合物C)阻断小管状肿瘤反馈(TGF)并降低血管抗性的假设并降低血管阻力。环状灌注romk抑制剂或呋塞米引起TGF的剂量依赖性钝化,但对呋塞米的反应更敏感(IC50 =10-6μm,用于呋塞米和IC50 =10-5μm)。在全身输注过程中,双利尿剂抑制TGF,但romk抑制剂敏感性为10倍(化合物C:63%抑制;呋塞米:32%抑制)。尽管TGF阻断,但恒定全身输注的1小时,双利尿剂可将肾小球过滤速率(GFR)和肾血流(RBF)降低40-60%并增加肾血管阻力(RVR)100-200%。既不是利尿剂改变血压或血细胞比容。近端小管静压压力(PPT)瞬时增加了利尿剂(化合物C:56%;呋塞米:70%增加),但返回基线。 romk抑制剂引起更多的Natriuresis(3,400 vs.1,600%的增加)和计算器(1200 vs.800%增加),但较少的Kaliuresis(33 vs.167%的增加)比呋塞米。总之,Romk或Na + -K + -2C1转运抑制TGF且增加了肾血管阻力。肾血管收缩率与体积耗竭,血压,TGF或PPT无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号