...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Can off-river water and shade provision reduce cattle intrusion into drinking water catchment riparian zones?
【24h】

Can off-river water and shade provision reduce cattle intrusion into drinking water catchment riparian zones?

机译:偏僻的水和遮荫设施能否减少牛群侵入饮用水集水区的河岸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cattle defecation into rivers and overgrazing of riparian zones, are major concerns for drinking water catchment managers. Behaviour modification has been proposed instead of fencing for managing impacts, but reported success varies. Our study aimed to resolve whether provision of off-stream water and shade on real working farms could reduce the likelihood of cattle entering watercourses feeding Sydney, Australia's primary water supply, Lake Burragorang (34 degrees S, 150 degrees E). Cattle herds (1.4 and 11 Animal Units ha-1) at two sites were fitted with Global Positioning System (GPS) collars (n=12). Cattle movements were tracked following installation of industry-recommended off-stream water and shade (twelve 2 week duration control + treatment experiments). Some statistically significant differences in movement (Mann-Whitney U Prob. <0.0001) were observed, as judged by comparisons of riparian, water trough and shade NEAR distances, and riparian zone visit number, duration and frequency. But effect magnitudes were small, inconsistent between different experiments, and insufficient to justify widespread water and shade provision. These findings contrast with the marked reductions in riparian impacts reported for rangeland pastured (>~1 km2) cattle, but were not inconsistent with smaller scale grazing studies. Statistically significant correlations (Spearman R) were, however, observed (Goulburn_1, Robertson_2 experiments respectively) between the movement of cattle within the same herd (0.94, 0.85), cattle in adjacent fields (0.7, 0.64), and heat stress related factors (temperature, light, humidity, wind) (0.1-0.5) indicating GPS tracking was sound and other factors more strongly influenced animal location. We hypothesize that our off-stream water and shade did not markedly influence cattle movement because our paddocks were relatively small (1.5 and 20 ha) compared to rangeland pastures. The study's main limitation was that GPS error prevented differentiation of riparian zone interaction from full stream contact. We recommend in future using direct video to overcome this, and differential quantification of these impacts.
机译:牛大便排入河流和河岸带过度放牧,是集水区管理者的主要关切。已经提出了行为修改而不是用围栏来管理影响,但是报告的成功有所不同。我们的研究旨在解决在实际的农场中提供下游水和遮荫是否可以减少牛进入水道为澳大利亚悉尼的主要水源Burragorang湖(北纬34度,东经150度)供水的可能性。在两个地点的牛群(1.4和11动物单位ha -1 )上装有全球定位系统(GPS)项圈(n = 12)。在安装了行业推荐的下游水和阴影之后(十二个为期2周的持续时间控制+处理实验),跟踪了牛的运动。通过比较河岸,水槽和阴影NEAR距离以及河岸区探访次数,持续时间和频率,可以观察到一些运动上的统计学差异(Mann-Whitney U Prob。<0.0001)。但是效果幅度很小,不同的实验之间不一致,并且不足以证明广泛的水和阴影供应合理。这些发现与牧场牧草(>〜1 km 2 )牛的河岸影响显着减少形成鲜明对比,但与较小规模的放牧研究并不一致。然而,在同一群内的牛的活动(0.94、0.85),相邻田间的牛(0.7、0.64)和热应激相关因子(温度,光线,湿度,风)(0.1-0.5)表示GPS跟踪是声音,其他因素对动物位置的影响更大。我们假设下游的水和阴影不会显着影响牛的活动,因为与牧场牧场相比,我们的围场相对较小(1.5和20公顷)。该研究的主要局限性是GPS误差阻止了河岸带相互作用与全流接触的区分。我们建议将来使用直接视频来克服这一问题,并对这些影响进行差分量化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号