...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Comparison of three remote sensing based models to estimate evapotranspiration in an oasis-desert region
【24h】

Comparison of three remote sensing based models to estimate evapotranspiration in an oasis-desert region

机译:三种估算绿洲荒漠地区蒸散量的遥感模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regional evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is crucial for regional water resources management and allocation. This paper evaluated the performance of three contextual remote sensing based models for ET estimation (METRIC Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration; the T-s-VI triangle model; and SSEB-Simplified Surface Energy Balance) in an oasis-desert region during a growing season under advective environmental conditions. The performance of the three models was first assessed using surface fluxes observed at five eddy covariance (EC) flux towers installed in different land-cover types. Comparisons among model outputs were then conducted on a pixel-by-pixel basis for three main land-cover types (farmland, transition zone and desert). For METRIC and SSEB, good correlations were obtained between the modeled versus measured instantaneous latent heat flux (lambda ET), with both R-2 values above 0.90. Outliers occurred when available energy was overestimated for the T-s-VI triangle model. Pixel-wise comparisons showed the greatest consistency between the T-s-VI triangle model and METRIC outputs in farmland with an R-2 of 0.98 and an RMSE of 13.69 W m(-2). Overall, METRIC outperformed both the T-s-VI triangle and SSEB models; the T-s-VI triangle model tended to overestimate and the SSEB to underestimate at higher values of lambda ET. ET estimations by SSEB and the T-s-VI triangle model are more sensitive to the estimated surface temperature and available energy than those from METRIC. Two daily ET extrapolation methods were evaluated with the EC measured daily ET. The results indicated that the constant reference ET fraction (ETrF) method could be used over well-watered areas due to the regional advection effect; the constant evaporative fraction (EF) method tended to give better outputs for other areas. Reasonable estimates of ET can be achieved by carefully selecting extreme pixels or edges, and validation is required when applying remote sensing based models, especially the contextual methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:区域蒸散量(ET)估算对于区域水资源管理和分配至关重要。本文评估了在绿洲-沙漠地区生长过程中三种基于遥感的环境模型的ET估计性能(高分辨率的METRIC映射蒸散与内部化校准; Ts-VI三角模型;以及SSEB简化的表面能平衡)。平流环境下的季节。首先使用安装在不同土地覆盖类型的五个涡流协方差(EC)通量塔处观察到的表面通量评估这三个模型的性能。然后,针对三种主要的土地覆盖类型(农田,过渡带和沙漠),逐像素进行模型输出之间的比较。对于METRIC和SSEB,在模型与测量的瞬时潜热通量(λET)之间获得了良好的相关性,两个R-2值均高于0.90。当T-s-VI三角模型的可用能量被高估时,发生异常值。以像素为单位的比较显示,T-s-VI三角形模型与农田的METRIC输出之间具有最大的一致性,R-2为0.98,RMSE为13.69 W m(-2)。总体而言,METRIC的表现优于T-s-VI三角形和SSEB模型;在较高的λET值时,T-s-VI三角模型倾向于高估,而SSEB则低估。由SSEB和T-s-VI三角模型得出的ET估计值比由METRIC估计的表面温度和可用能量更敏感。用EC测得的每日ET评估了两种每日ET外推方法。结果表明,由于区域对流作用,恒定参考ET分数(ETrF)方法可用于水源丰富的地区。恒定蒸发分数(EF)方法倾向于为其他区域提供更好的输出。可以通过仔细选择极端像素或边缘来实现对ET的合理估计,并且在应用基于遥感的模型(尤其是上下文方法)时需要进行验证。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号