首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Greening and producing: An economic assessment framework for integrating trees in cropping systems
【24h】

Greening and producing: An economic assessment framework for integrating trees in cropping systems

机译:绿化和生产:将树木纳入种植系统的经济评估框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental measures in an agricultural context often lead to extra constraints in current farming. This suggests trade-offs between the environmental objectives and profitability. Whether trade-offs exist, or may be turned into win-win, depends on creative farm options to comply new constraints. This paper concentrates on Ecological Focus Areas as a new EU Common Agricultural Policy greening requirement, and investigates profitability changes of two greening options with permanent woody elements, hedgerows and alley cropping. We predicted discounted gross margins for a hedgerow and alley cropping greening option and four market scenarios on a representative arable farm in Flanders (Belgium). Starting from the tree row, over a distance of 1.64 times the tree height, relative crop yield is 70% as compared to a treeless situation. Between 1.64 and 9.52 times the tree height, relative yield is 107%. Beyond that point, the effect is considered negligible. Discounted gross margins are calculated to account for the time horizon. Relative discounted gross margins at farm level, compared to the business as usual option, vary between 91% and 108%, depending on market conditions and policy support. The calculations show that fulfilment of the 5% ecological focus area greening requirement on arable farms with hedgerows and alley cropping only becomes economically competitive to the traditional cropping systems with extra financial stimuli (e.g. greening payments). We also show and discuss how the calculations can be fine-tuned and used in policy making, e.g. by i) getting better insights in the tree-crop interactions, ii) including the effect of e.g. crop type, tree species, tree line space and tree line orientation in the meta-information, iii) evaluating this conditional competitiveness and suggesting a better linking between subsidy level and ecological value and ecosystem services and iv) exploring novel valorization channels for wood products. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:农业方面的环境措施通常会导致当前农业的额外限制。这表明要在环境目标和盈利能力之间进行权衡。权衡是否存在,或者可能会变成双赢,取决于创造性的农场选择是否符合新的限制。本文将生态重点领域作为欧盟共同农业政策的一项新绿化要求,并研究了两种具有永久性木本元素,树篱和小巷种植的绿化方案的获利能力变化。我们预测了在法兰德斯(比利时)的一个有代表性的耕地上的绿篱和胡同种植绿化方案以及四种市场情景的折现毛利率。从树行开始,在树高的1.64倍的距离上,与无树情况相比,相对作物产量为70%。在树高的1.64到9.52倍之间,相对产量是107%。超过这一点,效果被认为是微不足道的。折现毛利率的计算考虑了时间范围。与常规业务相比,农场一级的相对折现毛利率在91%到108%之间,具体取决于市场条件和政策支持。计算表明,对具有篱笆和小巷种植的可耕种农场实现5%的生态重点区域绿化要求,仅在经济上比具有额外财政刺激(例如绿化付款)的传统种植系统更具竞争力。我们还将展示和讨论如何对计算进行微调,并将其用于决策中,例如通过i)更好地了解树木与作物的相互作用,ii)包括例如信息中的作物类型,树种,树线空间和树线方向,iii)评价这种条件竞争力,并建议补贴水平与生态价值和生态系统服务之间建立更好的联系,并且iv)探索木质产品的新型增值渠道。 (C)2016由Elsevier Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号