首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >In search of an optimized supplemental lighting spectrum for greenhouse tomato production with intracanopy lighting
【24h】

In search of an optimized supplemental lighting spectrum for greenhouse tomato production with intracanopy lighting

机译:寻找采用骨膜内照明的温室番茄生产优化的补充照明光谱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With anticipated energy-efficiency improvements and ever-improving light-distribution architectures, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are a promising alternative to current supplemental lighting (SL) technologies for greenhouse crop production. Yet, significant questions remain regarding how to best optimize spectral-quality effects on plant growth and development using LEDs in the greenhouse. The objective of this study was to compare different spectra of intracanopy (IC) SL using LEDs for high-wire greenhouse tomato [Solatium lycopersicum 'Merlice') production in a mid-northern climate during a winter-to-summer production cycle. Five lighting treatments were evaluated: solar light only (control); solar light + SL from IC-LED towers using different percentages of blue, red and/or far-red light: 10B-90R; 30B-70R; 25B-60R-15FR; or 80R-20FR, where B refers to blue (450 nm), R refers to red (627 nm), and FR refers to far-red (730 nm). A constant photon flux of 180 umol nv2 s1 was provided to all plants grownwith SL for 16 h d1. In general, light quality from SL did not affect weekly plant-growth measurements (leaf length and stem elongation), relative chlorophyll content (RCC), or plant productivity (fruit number and total fruit FW), but significantly altered leaf photosynthesis and abaxial stomatal density (SD) and index (SI). Although leaves grown with 25B-60R-15FR had higher stomatal conductance [gs) man all other treatments, their abaxial stomatal features were only ~87% those of leaves grown with 10B-90R. Leaf chlorophyll content was up to 11% higher for plants grown under any kind of SL compared to unsupplemented controls. Similarly, total fruit yield was higher for SL treatments relative to the control. The consequences and perspectives of using different light-quality treatments in the SL spectrum will be discussed.
机译:通过预期的能效改进和改善的光分配架构,发光二极管(LED)是对温室作物生产的电流补充照明(SL)技术的有希望的替代品。然而,关于如何在温室中使用LED最佳优化对植物生长和开发的谱质量影响的重要问题。本研究的目的是将intracanopy(IC)SL的不同光谱比较在北夏季生产周期中北部气候中的高线温室番茄[Solatium Lycopersicum'Merlice')生产。评估五种照明处理:仅限太阳灯(控制); Solar Light + SL从IC-LED塔使用不同百分比的蓝色,红色和/或远红光:10B-90R; 30B-70R; 25B-60R-15FR;或80R-20FR,其中B是指蓝色(450nm),R是指红色(627nm),并且FR指远红色(730nm)。将180μmolNV2S1的恒定光子通量提供给Growl 16 H D1的所有植物。一般而言,来自SL的光质不影响每周植物生长测量(叶子长度和茎伸长),相对叶绿素含量(RCC)或植物生产率(果实数和总果FW),但叶片光合作用和叶形气孔显着改变密度(SD)和指数(SI)。尽管用25B-60R-15FR生长的叶子具有较高的气孔导电,但是所有其他治疗的气孔导电,它们的轴向气孔特征仅为80B-90R生长的叶片〜87%。与未填充对照相比,在任何种类的SL下生长的植物,叶片叶绿素含量高达11%。类似地,对于SL处理相对于对照,总果实产量较高。将讨论使用SL光谱中的不同光质处理的后果和观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号