...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Market, state and community - three governance structures facilitating vegetable farmers' access to markets in Tanzania
【24h】

Market, state and community - three governance structures facilitating vegetable farmers' access to markets in Tanzania

机译:市场,州和社区 - 三个治理结构促进南桑尼亚在坦桑尼亚的市场获得市场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Interest in establishing new or strengthening existing farmer organizations to support agricultural development has been increasing in recent years. Donors and governments have long expected such organizations to complement or replace government initiatives for the provision of basic agricultural services, or to serve as instruments to promote equitable growth and poverty reduction. Despite the hopes invested in institutionalizing farmer organizations, there is growing evidence that project interventions promoting farmer organizations have not always led to viable ventures. In response, strong emphasis has been placed on identifying success factors linked to the structure of these organizations. Using the Lushoto district in Tanzania as a case study, we provide an alternative analytical approach to investigate farmer organizations engaged in vegetable marketing. Rather than comparing success factors of different farmer organizations, this study started with an analysis of the problems farmers and other vegetable value chain actors encounter. The problems they identified can be distilled into a basic failure to coordinate: among farmers themselves, and between farmers and other stakeholders. To overcome coordination failures that prevent farmers from accessing viable markets, finance or extension services, two vegetable marketing arrangements emerged: the Usambara Lishe Trust and Lushoto Korogwe Vegetables. These arrangements include quality monitoring systems, extension, or joint product deliverybased on institutional arrangements that combine features of three governance structures: markets, government, and civil society. Our analytical approach allows for an institutional perspective synthesis of viable mechanisms that directly address commoncoordination failures impeding integration of smallholder farmers into national, regional and global food chains.
机译:近年来,建立新的或加强现有农民组织的新的或加强现有农民组织的兴趣已经越来越大。捐助者和政府有长期预期的这些组织可以补充或取代提供基本农业服务的政府举措,或者作为促进公平增长和减贫的文书。尽管持希望投入了农民组织的制度化,但越来越多的证据表明,促进农民组织的项目干预措施并不总是导致可行的企业。作为回应,强调识别与这些组织结构相关的成功因素。使用坦桑尼亚的庐山地区作为案例研究,我们提供了替代分析方法来调查从事蔬菜营销的农民组织。这项研究而不是比较不同农民组织的成功因素,而是始于对农民和其他蔬菜价值链演员遭遇的问题的分析。可以蒸馏出他们所识别的问题,以协调:农民自己,以及农民和其他利益攸关方之间的基本失败。克服阻挠阻止农民访问可行的市场,财务或延期服务,出现了两个蔬菜营销安排:Usambara Lishe Trust和Lushoto Korogwe蔬菜。这些安排包括在制度安排上交付的质量监测系统,延期或联合产品,这些制度安排结合了三个治理结构的特征:市场,政府和民间社会。我们的分析方法允许制度视角综合可行的机制,即直接解决将小农农民整合到国家,区域和全球食物链中的共同讲座失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号