...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study

机译:加拿大西部牛肉生产温室气体排放的生命周期评估:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to estimate whole-farm greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from beef production in western Canada. The aim was to determine the relative contributions of the cow-calf and feedlot components to these emissions, and to examine the proportion of whole-farm emissions attributable to enteric methane (CH4). The simulated farm consisted of a beef production operation comprised of 120 cows, four bulls, and their progeny, with the progeny fattened in a feedlot. The farm also included cropland and native prairie pasture for grazing to supply the feed for the animals. The LCA was conducted over 8 years to fully account for the lifetime GHG emissions from the cows, bulls and progeny, as well as the beef marketed from cull cows, cull bulls, and progeny raised for market. The emissions were estimated using Mobs, a whole-farm model developed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Holos is an empirical model, with a yearly time-step, based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodology, modified for Canadian conditions and farm scale. The model considers all significant CH4, N2O, and CO2 emissions and removals on the farm, as well as emissions from manufacture of inputs (fertilizer, herbicides) and off-farm emissions of N2O derived from nitrogen applied on the farm. The LCA estimated the GHG intensity of beef production in this system at 22 kg CO2 equivalent (kg carcass)(-1). Enteric CH4 was the largest contributing source of GHG accounting for 63% of total emissions. Nitrous oxide from soil and manure accounted for a further 27% of the total emissions, while CH4 emissions from manure and CO2 energy emissions were minor contributors. Within the beef production cycle, the cow-calf system accounted for about 80% of total GHG emissions and the feedlot system for only 20%. About 84% of enteric CH4 was from the cow-calf herd, mostly from mature cows. It follows that mitigation practices to reduce GHG emissions from beef production should focus on reducing enteric CH4 production from mature beef cows. However, mitigation approaches must also recognize that the cow-calf production system also has many ancillary environmental benefits, allowing use of grazing and forage lands that can preserve soil carbon reserves and provide other ecosystems services. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:进行了生命周期评估(LCA),以估算加拿大西部牛肉生产中的全农场温室气体(GHG)排放。目的是确定牛犊和育肥场成分对这些排放的相对贡献,并检查可归因于肠甲烷(CH4)的全农场排放比例。模拟农场包括一个由120头母牛,4头公牛及其后代组成的牛肉生产作业,后代在饲养场中进行增肥。该农场还包括农田和草原牧场,用于放牧以为动物提供饲料。实施LCA历时8年,以充分考虑奶牛,公牛和后代以及从公牛,公牛和后代出售的牛肉销售的终生温室气体排放量。使用Mobs估算排放量,Mobs是加拿大农业和农业食品公司开发的全农场模型。 Holos是一个经验模型,它以政府间气候变化专门委员会的方法为基础,并按加拿大的条件和农场规模进行了修正,每年都有时间步长。该模型考虑了农场中所有重要的CH4,N2O和CO2排放量和清除量,以及投入品生产(化肥,除草剂)产生的排放量以及农场中施用的氮源产生的N2O的农场外排放量。 LCA估计该系统中牛肉生产的GHG强度为22 kg CO2当量(kg s体)(-1)。肠道甲烷是最大的温室气体排放源,占总排放量的63%。土壤和粪便中的一氧化二氮占总排放量的27%,而粪便中的CH4排放量和CO2能源排放量则较小。在牛肉生产周期中,牛犊牛系统占温室气体总排放量的80%左右,而育肥场系统仅占20%。肠道CH4中约84%来自牛犊群,大部分来自成年母牛。因此,减少牛肉生产中GHG排放的缓解措施应集中在减少成熟肉牛的肠CH4产生上。但是,缓解措施还必须认识到,牛犊生产系统还具有许多附带的环境效益,允许使用可以保留土壤碳储量并提供其他生态系统服务的放牧和牧草土地。 Crown版权所有(C)2010,由Elsevier Ltd.发行。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号