首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Understanding farm trajectories and development pathways: Two decades of change in southern Mali
【24h】

Understanding farm trajectories and development pathways: Two decades of change in southern Mali

机译:了解农场的发展轨迹和发展路径:马里南部的二十年变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Institutional support for smallholders has been the motor for the expanding cotton production sector in southern Mali since the 1970s. Smallholder farms exhibit diverse resource endowments and little is known on how they benefit from and cope with changes in this institutional support In this paper we explore farm trajectories during two decades (1994 to 2010) and their link with farm resource endowment and government support We distinguished a favourable period for cotton production and an unfavourable period during which institutional support collapsed. A panel survey that monitored 30 farms in the Koutiala district in southern Mali over this period was analysed. Based on indicators of resource endowment and using Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC), farms were grouped into four types: High Resource Endowed farms with Large Herds (HRE-LH), High Resource Endowed (HRE) farms, Medium Resource Endowed (MRE) farms and Low Resource Endowed (LRE) farms. Average yield, labour productivity and food self-sufficiency status of each type were calculated. Farms remaining in the same type were classified as 'hanging in', while farms moving to a type of higher yields, labour productivity and food self-sufficiency status were classified as 'stepping up', and farms following the opposite trajectory of deteriorating farming conditions were classified as 'falling down'. The LRE farms differed from all other farm types due to lower yields, while both LRE and HRE farms differed from the MRE and HRE-LH farm types due to a combination of less labour productivity and less food self-sufficiency. During those two decades, 17% of the farms 'stepped up', while 70% of the farms remained 'hanging in', and only 13% of the farms 'fell down'. We found no obvious negative impact of the collapse of government support on farm trajectories. For MRE, HRE and HRE-LH farms, average N and P use intensity increased from 1994 to 2004 and then decreased during the following cotton crisis. On the other hand, organic fertilizer use intensity increased continuously over the entire monitoring period for HRE-LH and MRE farms. Crop yields did not change significantly over time for any farm type and labour productivity decreased. We discuss how technical options specific for different farm types (increase in farm equipment, sale of cereals, incorporation of legumes and intensification of milk production) and broader institutional change (improvement in finance system and infrastructure, tariffs) can enhance 'step up' trajectories for farming households and avoid stagnation Changing in') of the whole agricultural sector. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:自1970年代以来,对小农户的机构支持一直是马里南部扩大棉花生产部门的动力。小农农场展现出多样化的资源and赋,人们对其如何从这种制度支持中受益和应对变化知之甚少。在本文中,我们探索了二十年(1994年至2010年)期间的农业发展轨迹,以及它们与农场资源end赋和政府支持之间的联系。棉花生产的有利时期,而体制支持崩溃的不利时期。分析了一次小组调查,该调查在此期间监测了马里南部Koutiala区的30个农场。根据资源end赋指标并使用升序层次分类(AHC),将农场分为四种类型:大资源高资源with赋农场(HRE-LH),高资源End赋(HRE)农场,中等资源End赋(MRE)农场和资源匮乏(LRE)场。计算每种类型的平均产量,劳动生产率和食物自给状态。保持相同类型的农场被归类为“闲置”,而向更高产量,劳动生产率和粮食自给自足状态迁移的农场被归类为“逐步升级”,而农场的耕种条件却相反被归类为“摔倒”。由于单产较低,LRE农场与所有其他农场类型不同,而LRE和HRE农场与MRE和HRE-LH农场类型不同,这归因于劳动生产率降低和食品自给率降低。在这二十年中,有17%的农场“加紧”,而70%的农场仍“挂着”,只有13%的农场“倒下”。我们发现政府支持的崩溃对农场发展轨迹没有明显的负面影响。对于MRE,HRE和HRE-LH农场,从1994年到2004年,平均氮和磷的使用强度增加,随后在棉花危机期间下降。另一方面,在HRE-LH和MRE农场的整个监测期内,有机肥料的使用强度持续增加。任何农场类型的作物产量都不会随时间显着变化,劳动生产率下降。我们将讨论针对不同农场类型的特定技术选择(增加农业设备,谷物销售,豆类的纳入和牛奶生产的集约化)以及更广泛的体制变革(金融体系和基础设施的改善,关税的提高)如何提高“步伐”的轨迹避免农户陷入停滞。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号