...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Climate change and water security: estimating the greenhouse gas costs of achieving water security through investments in modern irrigation technology.
【24h】

Climate change and water security: estimating the greenhouse gas costs of achieving water security through investments in modern irrigation technology.

机译:气候变化与水安全:通过对现代灌溉技术的投资来估算实现水安全所需的温室气体成本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are significant concerns about the longer term impact of climate change and climate variability on water availability in Australia. Modern irrigation technologies are seen as a way to manage climate change impacts and improve water security. However, while modern irrigation technologies may save volumes of water, it is likely that they will result in increased on-farm energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, suggesting potential conflicts in terms of mitigation and adaptation policies. Five irrigation technology transformation scenarios - three historical and two adoption - were developed to evaluate industry-wide tradeoffs between water savings, energy consumption (and GHG emissions), and economic returns associated with irrigation technology transformations under current Australian Government water resource policies. Three of the five scenarios tested showed tradeoffs between water savings and GHG emissions, with water savings through conversion of irrigation systems increasing both energy consumption and GHG emissions. For example, 120 GL/year of water savings achieved through drip irrigation adoption for cotton cropping would increase energy consumption by 889 TJ/year and GHG emissions by 250,000 t CO2e/year. A carbon price of $20/t CO2e would result in additional costs nationally of about $5 m/year. However, this study also indicated that significant benefit in terms of water savings and GHG reduction can be achieved when replacing older inefficient and energy-intensive systems, such as hand shift and roll-line sprinkler systems, especially when these are replaced with drip irrigation systems. We suggest priority should be given to replacing such systems while implementing the on-farm infrastructure investment policy. The findings of the study support the use of an integrated approach to avoid possible conflicts in designing national climate change mitigation and adaptation policies, both of which are being developed in Australia.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.009
机译:人们对澳大利亚气候变化和气候变化对水资源的长期影响产生了重大关切。现代灌溉技术被视为管理气候变化影响和改善水安全的一种方式。但是,尽管现代灌溉技术可以节水,但可能会导致农场能源消耗和温室气体(GHG)排放增加,这在缓解和适应政策方面存在潜在冲突。在当前澳大利亚政府水资源政策下,开发了五种灌溉技术改造方案(三种历史方案和两种采用方案),以评估全行业在节水,能源消耗(和温室气体排放)以及与灌溉技术改造相关的经济回报之间的权衡。在所测试的五个方案中,有三个方案显示了节水与温室气体排放之间的权衡,通过灌溉系统的转换节水增加了能耗和温室气体排放。例如,通过采用滴灌技术实现棉花种植每年节水120 GL,将使能源消耗增加889 TJ /年,将温室气体排放增加250,000 t CO 2 e /年。碳价为20美元/吨CO 2 e,全国每年将产生500万美元的额外成本。但是,这项研究还表明,当更换旧的低效且耗能的系统(例如手动换档和滚动管线喷水器系统)时,尤其是将其替换为滴灌系统时,可以在节水和减少温室气体方面取得显着收益。 。我们建议在实施农场基础设施投资政策时应优先更换此类系统。该研究的结果支持在设计国家减缓气候变化和适应政策时使用综合方法以避免可能的冲突,这两种方法均在澳大利亚制定。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.agsy.2012.12.009

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号