首页> 外文期刊>Birth defects research, Part A. Clinical and molecular teratology >Fetal genetic risk of isolated cleft lip only versus isolated cleft lip and palate: a subphenotype analysis using two population-based studies of orofacial clefts in scandinavia.
【24h】

Fetal genetic risk of isolated cleft lip only versus isolated cleft lip and palate: a subphenotype analysis using two population-based studies of orofacial clefts in scandinavia.

机译:仅孤立唇裂与孤立唇裂和isolated裂的胎儿遗传风险:使用两个基于人群的斯堪的纳维亚半岛口唇裂研究进行亚表型分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cleft lip only (CLO) and cleft lip and palate (CLP) are commonly regarded as variants of the same defect and are traditionally combined to form the single group of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/ P) prior to analysis. However, recent data have suggested that at least a subgroup of isolated CLO may be etiologi-cally distinct from isolated CLP. METHODS: To explore fetal genetic risk of isolated CLO separately from isolated CLP, we performed a subphenotype analysis using two population-based studies of clefts in Scandinavia. One hundred twenty-one isolated CLO, 190 isolated CLP, and 592 control triads were available from Norway (1996-2001), and a further 76 isolated CLO and 107 isolated CLP triads were available from Denmark (1991-2001).
机译:通常将仅唇裂(CLO)和唇裂和pa裂(CLP)视为同一缺损的变体,并且在分析之前,通常将其合并形成具有或不具有left裂(CL / P)的单组唇裂。但是,最近的数据表明,至少一个分离的CLO的亚组可能在病因上与分离的CLP不同。方法:为了探讨分离的CLO和分离的CLP的胎儿遗传风险,我们使用了两个基于人群的斯堪的纳维亚半岛裂痕研究,进行了亚表型分析。挪威(1996-2001年)提供了121个分离的CLO,190个单独的CLP和592个对照三联体,丹麦(1991-2001年)又提供了76个分离的CLO和107个分离的CLP三联体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号