...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: Results from the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery national database
【24h】

Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: Results from the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery national database

机译:老年患者的机械与生物学主动脉瓣假体的长期安全性和有效性:结果胸外科医生成人心脏手术国家数据库

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND - : There is a paucity of long-term data comparing biological versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses in older individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS - : We performed follow-up of patients aged 65 to 80 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a biological (n=24 410) or mechanical (n=14 789) prosthesis from 1991 to 1999 at 605 centers within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database using Medicare inpatient claims (mean, 12.6 years; maximum, 17 years; minimum, 8 years), and outcomes were compared by propensity methods. Among Medicare-linked patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (mean age, 73 years), both reoperation (4.0%) and endocarditis (1.9%) were uncommon to 12 years; however, the risk for other adverse outcomes was high, including death (66.5%), stroke (14.1%), and bleeding (17.9%). Compared with those receiving a mechanical valve, patients given a bioprosthesis had a similar adjusted risk for death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07), higher risks for reoperation (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-3.03) and endocarditis (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.94), and lower risks for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.70). Although these results were generally consistent among patient subgroups, bioprosthesis patients aged 65 to 69 years had a substantially elevated 12-year absolute risk of reoperation (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS - : Among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, long-term mortality rates were similar for those who received bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves. Bioprostheses were associated with a higher long-term risk of reoperation and endocarditis but a lower risk of stroke and hemorrhage. These risks varied as a function of a patient's age and comorbidities.
机译:背景 - :在老年人中比较生物与机械主动脉瓣假体的长期数据缺乏。方法和结果 - :我们在1991年至1999年在1991年至1999年,在1991年至1999年,在1991年至1999年,在1991年至1999年,在605个中心,进行了65至80年患者的后续患者的后续患者。胸外科医生成人心脏手术数据库使用Medicare住院声明(平均值,12.6岁;最大,17岁;最低8年)和结果进行了比较。在接受主动脉瓣置换(平均年龄,73岁)的Medicare相关的患者中,重新进食(4.0%)和心内膜炎(1.9%)罕见至12岁;然而,其他不良结果的风险很高,包括死亡(66.5%),中风(14.1%)和出血(17.9%)。与接收机械阀的人相比,患有生物化的患者对死亡(危害比率为1.04; 95%; 95%置信区间,1.01-1.07),重新组合的风险更高(危险比,2.55; 95%; 95%; 95%; 95%; 95%; 2.14-3.03)和心内膜炎(危险比,1.60; 95%置信区间,1.31-1.94)和卒中风险降低(危险比,0.87; 95%置信区间,0.82-0.93)和出血(危险比,0.66; 95%置信区间,0.62-0.70)。虽然这些结果通常在患者亚组中一致,但65岁至69岁的生物体育患者具有大幅提高的12年的重新进食风险(10.5%)。结论 - 在接受主动脉瓣置换的患者中,对于接受生物假物与机械阀的人来说,长期死亡率相似。生物原因与细胞和心内膜炎的长期风险较高,但卒中风险和出血的风险较低。这些风险随着患者年龄和合并症的函数而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号