...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database
【24h】

Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database

机译:桥梁与连续流动左心室辅助装置移植的影响,对后翻来的死亡率死亡率对器官共享数据库联合网络的倾向匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Bridge to transplantation (BTT) with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is a mainstay of therapy for heart failure in patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). Criteria for HT listing do not differ between patients medically managed and those mechanically bridged to HT. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the impact of BTT with LVAD on posttransplantation survival, to describe differences in causes of 1-year mortality in medically and mechanically bridged patients, and to evaluate differences in risk factors for 1-year mortality between those with and those without LVAD at the time of HT. Methods: Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we identified 5486 adult, single-organ HT recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2015. Patients were propensity matched for likelihood of LVAD at the time of HT. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess the impact of BTT on 1- and 5-year mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the odds ratio of 1-year mortality for patients BTT with LVAD compared with those with medical management across clinically significant variables at various thresholds. Results: Early mortality was higher in mechanically bridged patients: 9.5% versus 7.2% mortality at 1 year (P 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio, 2.11; P 60 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 30 kg/m(2), there were significant differences in 1-year mortality between medium- and high-risk medically and mechanically bridged patients, with 1-year mortality in high-risk BTT patients at 17.6% compared with 10.4% in high-risk medically managed patients. Conclusions: Bridge to HT with LVAD, although necessary because of organ scarcity and capable of improving wait list survival, confers a significantly higher risk of early posttransplantation mortality. Patients bridged with mechanical support may require more careful consideration for transplant eligibility after LVAD placement.
机译:背景:与左心室辅助装置(LVADS)进行移植(BTT)的桥是在等待心脏移植(HT)的患者中心力衰竭治疗的主要疗法。 HT列表的标准在医学管理和机械桥接到HT的患者之间没有区别。本研究的目的是评估BTT与LVAD对后翻透生存的影响,描述医学和机械桥接患者1年死亡率的原因差异,并评估危险因素的危险因素差异为1年的死亡率在HT时没有LVAD的那些。方法:使用联合网络的器官共享数据库,我们确定了5486年的成人,在2008年至2015年间移植了5486名成人单反毒品HT受体。患者在HT时达到LVAD的可能性匹配。 Kaplan-Meier生存期估计用于评估BTT对1年和5年死亡率的影响。逻辑回归分析用于评估LVAD患者BTT患者的1年死亡率的差距比,与各种阈值的临床显着变量相比。结果:机械桥接患者早期死亡率较高:1年内死亡率为9.5%(P 30 kg / m(2)(差距,2.11; p 60岁,估计肾小球过滤率30kg / m(2) ,中高风险的药物和机械桥接患者之间的1年死亡率差异显着差异,高风险的BTT患者的死亡率为17.6%,而高风险的医学患者中的10.4%。结论:桥梁与LVAD,虽然有必要的因器官稀缺而必要,但能够改善等待列表生存,赋予早期持续性死亡率的显着较高风险。伴随机械支撑的患者可能需要更加仔细考虑在LVAD放置后移植资格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号