首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural processes >Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes
【24h】

Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes

机译:冲动选择的机制:III。奖励过程的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two experiments examined the relationship between reward processing and impulsive choice. In Experiment 1, rats chose between a smaller-sooner (SS) reward (1 pellet, 10 s) and a larger-later (LL) reward (1, 2, and 4 pellets, 30 s). The rats then experienced concurrent variable-interval 30-s schedules with variations in reward magnitude to evaluate reward magnitude discrimination. LL choice behavior positively correlated with reward magnitude discrimination. In Experiment 2, rats chose between an SS reward (1 pellet, 10 s) and an LL reward (2 and 4 pellets, 30 s). The rats then received either a reward intervention which consisted of concurrent fixed-ratio schedules associated with different magnitudes to improve their reward magnitude discrimination, or a control task. All rats then experienced a post-intervention impulsive choice task followed by a reward magnitude discrimination task to assess intervention efficacy. The rats that received the intervention exhibited increases in post-intervention LL choice behavior, and made more responses for larger-reward magnitudes in the reward magnitude discrimination task, suggesting that the intervention heightened sensitivities to reward magnitude. The results suggest that reward magnitude discrimination plays a key role in individual differences in impulsive choice, and could be a potential target for further intervention developments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:两项实验检验了奖励处理与冲动选择之间的关系。在实验1中,大鼠在较慢的(SS)奖励(1个颗粒,10 s)和较大的(LL)奖励(1、2和4个颗粒,30 s)之间进行选择。然后,大鼠经历并发的可变间隔30-s时间表,其中奖励幅度有所变化,以评估奖励幅度歧视。 LL选择行为与奖励幅度歧视呈正相关。在实验2中,大鼠在SS奖励(1个颗粒,10 s)和LL奖励(2和4个颗粒,30 s)之间进行选择。然后,大鼠接受奖励干预或控制任务,奖励干预包括与不同幅度相关的并发固定比例计划,以改善奖励幅度的辨别力。然后,所有大鼠都经历了干预后的冲动选择任务,随后是奖励幅度歧视任务,以评估干预效果。接受干预的大鼠表现出干预后的LL选择行为增加,并且在奖励幅度歧视任务中对较大奖励幅度做出更多响应,这表明干预措施提高了对奖励幅度的敏感性。结果表明,奖励幅度歧视在冲动选择的个体差异中起关键作用,并且可能成为进一步干预发展的潜在目标。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号