...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Femoral nerve block with selective tibial nerve block provides effective analgesia without foot drop after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study
【24h】

Femoral nerve block with selective tibial nerve block provides effective analgesia without foot drop after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

机译:股骨神经阻滞与选择性胫骨神经阻滞可在全膝关节置换术后提供有效的止痛效果,而不会导致脚部掉落:一项前瞻性,随机,观察者盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty may provide superior analgesia but can produce footdrop, which may mask surgically induced peroneal nerve injury. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, we evaluated whether performing a selective tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa would avoid complete peroneal motor block. METHODS:: Eighty patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa or a sciatic nerve block proximal to its bifurcation in combination with femoral nerve block as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. Local anesthetic solution of sufficient volume to encircle the target nerve was administered for the block, up to a maximum of 20 mL. General anesthesia was administered for surgery. After emergence from anesthesia, in the recovery room, the presence or absence of peroneal sensory and motor block was noted. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded for 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS:: The tibial nerve block and sciatic nerve block were performed 1.7 cm (99% CI, 1.3 to 2.1) and 9.4 cm (99% CI, 8.3 to 10.5) proximal to the popliteal crease, respectively (99% CI for difference between means: 6.4 to 9.0; P < 0.001). A lower volume of ropivacaine 0.5% was used for the tibial nerve block, 8.7 mL (99% CI, 7.9 to 9.4) versus 15.2 mL (99% CI, 14.9 to 15.5), respectively (99% CI for difference between means, 5.6 to 7.3; P < 0.001). No patient receiving a tibial nerve block developed complete peroneal motor block compared to 82.5% of patients with sciatic nerve block (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the pain scores and opioid consumption between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:: Tibial nerve block performed in the popliteal fossa in close proximity to the popliteal crease avoided complete peroneal motor block and provided similar postoperative analgesia compared to sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
机译:背景:坐骨神经阻滞与股神经阻滞相结合进行全膝关节置换术可能会提供优越的镇痛效果,但会产生脚痛,这可能掩盖了手术引起的腓骨神经损伤。在这项前瞻性,随机,观察者盲目的研究中,我们评估了在the窝进行选择性胫骨神经阻滞能否避免完全性腓骨运动阻滞。方法:80例原发于全膝关节置换术的患者被随机分配接受the窝的胫神经阻滞或分叉近端的坐骨神经阻滞并结合股神经阻滞作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分。对该阻滞剂施予足够体积以包围目标神经的局部麻醉剂溶液,最大20 mL。进行全身麻醉以进行手术。麻醉后,在恢复室中,发现有无腓骨感觉和运动障碍。术后24小时记录疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗。结果:胫骨神经阻滞和坐骨神经阻滞分别在the肌折痕近端进行1.7 cm(99%CI,1.3至2.1)和9.4 cm(99%CI,8.3至10.5)进行((骨之间的差异为99%CI)表示:6.4至9.0; P <0.001)。胫骨神经阻滞使用的罗哌卡因体积较小,为0.5%,分别为8.7mL(99%CI,7.9至9.4)和15.2mL(99%CI,14.9至15.5)(均值之间的差异为99%CI,5.6)至7.3; P <0.001)。接受胫骨神经阻滞的患者中没有发生完全的腓骨运动阻滞,而坐骨神经阻滞的患者为82.5%(P <0.001)。两组之间的疼痛评分和阿片类药物摄入量无显着差异。结论:在total窝附近进行的胫神经阻滞可避免完全腓骨运动阻滞,与坐骨神经阻滞联合股神经阻滞相结合的全膝关节置换术患者相比,可避免完全腓骨运动阻滞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号