...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Low volume and high concentration of local anesthetic is more efficacious than high volume and low concentration in Labat's sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison.
【24h】

Low volume and high concentration of local anesthetic is more efficacious than high volume and low concentration in Labat's sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison.

机译:在Labat坐骨神经阻滞中,低剂量和高浓度的局麻药比高剂量和低浓度的麻醉药更有效:前瞻性,随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Various factors markedly affect the onset time and success rate, of peripheral nerve blockade. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study, compared a dose of mepivacaine 300 mg, in a 20 or 30 mL injection volume for sciatic nerve blockade using Labat's posterior approach. METHODS: A total of 90 patients undergoing foot surgery were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve block with 20 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine (n = 45) or 30 mL of 1% mepivacaine (n = 45). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency 2 Hz; intensity 1.5-0.5 mA). In the two groups, appropriate nerve stimulation was elicited at <0.5 mA and the targeted evoked motor response was plantar flexion of the foot. Time required for onset of sensory and motor block in the distribution of the tibial and common peroneal nerves were recorded. A successful block was defined as a complete loss of pinprick sensation in the sciatic nerve distribution with concomitant inability to perform plantar or dorsal flexion of the foot. RESULTS: A greater success rate was observed with 20 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine (96.6%) than with 30 mL of 1% mepivacaine (68.9%; P < 0.05). Time to onset of complete sensory and motor block was shorter after injection of 20 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine (11 +/- 6 min and 13 +/- 7 min, respectively) than after 30 mL of 1% mepivacaine (17 +/- 8 min and 19 +/- 8 min, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In Labat's sciatic nerve blockade, administering a low volume and a high concentration of local anesthetic (1.5% mepivacaine) is associated with a higher success rate and a shorter onset time than a high volume and a low concentration of solution (1% mepivacaine).
机译:背景:各种因素显着影响周围神经阻滞的发作时间和成功率。这项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究比较了使用Labat的后入路方法,以20或30 mL注射量对300 mg甲哌卡因剂量进行坐骨神经阻滞的情况。方法:总共90例接受足部手术的患者被随机分配接受坐骨神经阻滞,分别接受20 mL 1.5%米比卡因(n = 45)或30 mL 1%mepivacaine(n = 45)。使用神经刺激器(刺激频率2 Hz;强度1.5-0.5 mA)进行所有阻滞。在这两组中,在<0.5 mA时会引起适当的神经刺激,目标诱发的运动反应是足底flex屈。记录在胫骨和腓总神经分布中感觉和运动阻滞发作所需的时间。成功的阻滞定义为坐骨神经分布中完全失去了针刺感觉,并伴随着无法进行脚的足底或背屈。结果:20 mL的1.5%甲哌卡因(96.6%)的成功率高于30 mL的1%的甲哌卡因(68.9%; P <0.05)。注射20 mL的1.5%甲哌卡因(分别为11 +/- 6分钟和13 +/- 7分钟)后,开始完全感觉和运动阻滞的时间比注射30%的1%甲哌卡因(17 +/-)后更短8分钟和19 +/- 8分钟,P <0.05)。结论:在拉巴特的坐骨神经阻滞中,与高剂量和低浓度溶液(1%甲哌卡因)一起使用低剂量和高浓度的局部麻醉药(1.5%甲哌卡因)与较高的成功率和较短的发作时间相关)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号