首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >The impact of multilumen infusion devices on the occurrence of known physical drug incompatibility: A controlled in vitro study
【24h】

The impact of multilumen infusion devices on the occurrence of known physical drug incompatibility: A controlled in vitro study

机译:多腔输注设备对已知物理药物不相容性发生的影响:一项体外对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Drug incompatibility is a problem, especially when managing patients in intensive care units. We designed the present study to assess the impact of multilumen infusion access devices on the occurrence of known physical drug incompatibility through a controlled in vitro study. METHODS:: Three infusion devices connected to a single-lumen catheter were studied: a standard set with 2-port manifold and 1-m extension set and 2 multilumen infusion access devices: a 3-lumen extension set and a 9-lumen extension set (Edelvaiss-Multiline?; Doran International, Toussieu, France). For the 9-lumen extension set, 3 infusion access combinations were studied. Furosemide, midazolam, and saline were infused simultaneously through 3 infusion devices. Three concentrations of furosemide were tested. The infusion rate of saline (carrier) was initially set at 100 mL/h and stepwise decreased by 10 mL/h until precipitate formation. Physical incompatibility was assessed by 2 tests: visual inspection and the subvisible particle count test according to the European Pharmacopeia. The lowest saline infusion rate to prevent visible precipitate and attain an acceptable particle count (i.e., to pass "the 2 tests") was reported for each infusion set. RESULTS:: The standard set revealed visible precipitate even at the highest saline flow rate (100 mL/h). The 3-lumen device prevented drug precipitation using the 2 lowest furosemide concentrations with a saline infusion rate that decreased with furosemide concentration. The 9-lumen infusion access device prevented drug precipitation whatever the furosemide concentration for 2 access combinations using saline infusion rates of between 20 and 60 mL/h but not for a third access combination, despite saline infusion rates equal to 100 mL/h. CONCLUSIONS:: Infusion device characteristics appear to have an impact on the physical compatibility of the 2 drugs. Under specified conditions, the 9-lumen infusion access device prevents physical furosemide-midazolam incompatibility.
机译:背景:药物不相容是一个问题,尤其是在重症监护病房中管理患者时。我们设计了本研究,以通过一项受控的体外研究评估多腔输液接入设备对已知物理药物不相容性发生的影响。方法:研究了三个与单腔导管连接的输液设备:一个带有2端口歧管和1-m扩展套件的标准套件和两个多腔输液通道:一个3腔扩展套件和一个9腔扩展套件(Edelvaiss-Multiline?; Doran International,法国图西乌)。对于9腔扩展套件,研究了3种输液通道组合。通过3个输液装置同时注入速尿,咪达唑仑和盐水。测试了三种浓度的速尿。最初将盐水(载体)的注入速率设置为100 mL / h,然后逐步降低10 mL / h,直到形成沉淀为止。物理不相容性通过2种测试进行评估:根据欧洲药典进行的目视检查和亚可见颗粒计数测试。对于每个输注装置,报告了最低的盐水输注速度,以防止出现可见的沉淀并达到可接受的颗粒数(即通过“两次测试”)。结果:即使在最高盐水流速(100 mL / h)下,标准组也显示出可见的沉淀。 3腔器械使用2种最低速尿浓度来防止药物沉淀,并且盐水注入速率随速尿浓度降低而降低。 9腔输液通道装置使用20到60 mL / h之间的盐水输注速率,无论2种通道组合的速尿浓度如何,均能防止药物沉淀,尽管盐水输注速率等于100 mL / h,但对于第三种通道组合却不能。结论:输液装置的特性似乎对这两种药物的物理相容性有影响。在规定的条件下,9腔输液装置可防止速尿-咪达唑仑的不相容性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号