首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for M M edicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for M M edicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial

机译:大县卫生部门M米EDICAID受益人对邮件提醒的比较有效性:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but underused. Screening rates are lower among Medicaid beneficiaries versus other insured populations. No studies have examined mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)–based outreach programs for Medicaid beneficiaries. Methods In a patient‐level randomized controlled trial, a mailed CRC screening reminder plus FIT, sent from an urban health department to Medicaid beneficiaries, was compared with the same reminder without FIT. The reminder group could request FIT. Completed FIT kits were processed by the health department laboratory. Respondents were notified of normal results by mail. Abnormal results were given via phone by a patient navigator who provided counselling and assistance with follow‐up care. The primary outcome was FIT return. Results In all, 2144 beneficiaries at average CRC risk were identified, and there was no evidence of screening with Medicaid claims data. To the reminder+FIT group, 1071 were randomized, and 1073 were randomized to the reminder group; 307 (28.7%) in the reminder+FIT group and 347 (32.3%) in the reminder group were unreachable or ineligible (previous screening). The FIT return rate was significantly higher in the reminder+FIT group than the reminder group (21.1% vs 12.3%; difference, 8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7%‐13.9%; P ??.01). Eighteen individuals (7.2%) who completed FIT tests had abnormal results, and 15 were eligible for follow‐up colonoscopy; 66.7% (n?=?10) completed follow‐up colonoscopy. Conclusions A health department–based, mailed FIT program targeting Medicaid beneficiaries was feasible. Including a FIT kit resulted in greater screening completion than a reminder letter alone. Further research is needed to understand the comparative cost‐effectiveness of these interventions.
机译:背景背直肠癌(CRC)筛选是有效但未用的。药水果受益者与其他保险人群的筛选率较低。没有研究过邮件粪便免疫化学测试(适合)的医疗补助受益人的外展计划。方法在患者水平随机对照试验中,从城市卫生部门发送到医疗补助受益者的邮寄CRC筛选提醒加合物,与同样的提醒进行了比较而不适合。提醒小组可以要求合适。已完成的贴身套件由卫生部门实验室加工。受访者通过邮件通知正常结果。通过手机通过电话提供异常结果,患者导航员提供咨询和帮助随访。主要结果是健康回报。结果,确定了平均CRC风险的2144名受益者,并没有证据表明医疗补助声明数据进行筛选。提醒+ FIT组,1071被随机化,1073人随机分为提醒集团;提醒+ FIT组中的307(28.7%)和提醒小组中的347(32.3%)无法访问或不合格(以前的筛查)。提醒+ FIT组的配料回流率明显高于提醒组(21.1%Vs 12.3%;差异,8.8%; 95%置信区间,3.7%-13.9%; p?& 01)。完成拟合试验的十八个个人(7.2%)的结果异常,15个有资格进行后续结肠镜检查; 66.7%(n?=?10)完成后续结肠镜检查。结论针对医疗补助受益者的卫生部门的邮寄股份计划是可行的。包括适合套件导致比单独提醒夹的筛选完成更大。需要进一步研究来了解这些干预措施的比较成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号