...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Randomized phase 2 trial of pemetrexed, pemetrexed/bevacizumab, and pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB/IV non–small cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2
【24h】

Randomized phase 2 trial of pemetrexed, pemetrexed/bevacizumab, and pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB/IV non–small cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

机译:在IIIB / IV非小细胞肺癌患者和东部合作肿瘤患者中,培养基,聚光磷酸盐/贝伐单抗和磷酸盐/卡铂/贝伐单抗的随机相2试验及2

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The best treatment for patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor performance status is not well defined. In this phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to receive treatment with either single‐agent pemetrexed or 1 of 2 combination regimens. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed nonsquamous NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 were stratified by age and serum albumin level and were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 regimens: pemetrexed (arm 1), pemetrexed and bevacizumab (arm 2), or pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (arm 3). The response to treatment was assessed every 2 cycles; responding and stable patients continued treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS One hundred seventy‐two patients were randomized, 162 patients began the study treatment, and 146 patients completed 2 cycles and were evaluated for their response. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months in arm 1, 4.0 months in arm 2, and 4.8 months in arm 3. The overall response rates were 15% in arm 1, 31% in arm 2, and 44% in arm 3. The overall survival was similar in the 3 treatment arms. All 3 regimens were relatively well tolerated. Patients receiving bevacizumab had an increased incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, and bleeding episodes, but most events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS All 3 regimens were feasible for patients with advanced NSCLC and an ECOG performance status of 2. The addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed increased the overall response rate. The efficacy of pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab (median PFS, 4.8 months) approached the prespecified study PFS goal of 5 months. Larger studies will be necessary to define the role of bevacizumab in addition to standard pemetrexed and carboplatin in this population. Cancer 2018;124:1982‐91 . ? 2018 American Cancer Society .
机译:背景技术前期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的最佳治疗和性能状况不佳。在该阶段2试验中,患者被随机分组​​接受用单体剂培养基或2个组合方案接受治疗。方法患有新诊断的组织学证实的非调节NSCLC和东部合作肿瘤组(ECOG)性能状态的患者2按年龄和血清白蛋白水平分层,并随机(1:1:1)至3个方案中的1个:Pemetrexed(ARM 1),聚光磷酸和贝伐单抗(ARM 2),或浇注,卡铂和Bevacizumab(ARM 3)。每2个循环评估对治疗的反应;响应和稳定的患者继续治疗直至进展或不可接受的毒性。结果百七十二名患者随机,162名患者开始研究治疗,146名患者完成了2个循环,并评估了他们的反应。中位进展生存期(PFS)在ARM 1,4.0个月内为2.8个月,手臂2,手臂4.8个月3.整体反应率为15%,手臂21%,31%,44% ARM 3. 3治疗臂中的整体存活率相似。所有3个方案相对良好耐受。接受贝伐单抗的患者发生高血压,蛋白尿和出血发作的发病率增加,但大多数事件都很温和或中度。结论所有3个方案对于高级NSCLC的患者可行,ECOG性能状况为2.添加贝伐单抗以培养率提高整体响应率。聚磷酸盐/卡铂/贝伐单抗(中位数PFS,4.8个月)的疗效接近预先确定的研究PFS目标为5个月。对于这种人群中标准的磷酸盐和卡铂,还需要更大的研究来确定Bevacizumab的作用。癌症2018; 124:1982-91。还2018年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号