首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >A Comparison of Web-Based with Traditional Classroom-Based Training of Lung Ultrasound for the Exclusion of Pneumothorax
【24h】

A Comparison of Web-Based with Traditional Classroom-Based Training of Lung Ultrasound for the Exclusion of Pneumothorax

机译:基于Web与传统基于课堂的肺超声排除气胸的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a well-established method that can exclude pneumothorax by demonstration of pleural sliding and the associated ultrasound artifacts. The positive diagnosis of pneumothorax is more difficult to obtain and relies on detection of the edge of a pneumothorax, called the "lung point." Yet, anesthesiologists are not widely taught these techniques, even though their patients are susceptible to pneumothorax either through trauma or as a result of central line placement or regional anesthesia techniques performed near the thorax. In anticipation of an increased training demand for LUS, efficient and scalable teaching methods should be developed. In this study, we compared the improvement in LUS skills after either Web-based or classroom-based training. We hypothesized that Web-based training would not be inferior to "traditional" classroom-based training beyond a noninferiority limit of 10% and that both would be superior to no training. Furthermore, we hypothesized that this short training session would lead to LUS skills that are similar to those of ultrasound-trained emergency medicine (EM) physicians.
机译:背景:肺超声(LUS)是一种公认​​的方法,可通过显示胸膜滑动和相关的超声伪像来排除气胸。气胸的阳性诊断更难获得,并且依赖于检测气胸边缘,称为“肺点”。然而,即使麻醉医师由于创伤或由于在胸腔附近进行中心线放置或局部麻醉技术而易患气胸,也并未广泛地向麻醉学家传授这些技术。预期对LUS的培训需求将增加,应开发有效且可扩展的教学方法。在本研究中,我们比较了基于Web或基于课堂的培训后LUS技能的提高。我们假设基于网络的培训在非劣质性限制(超过10%)之后不会逊于“传统”基于课堂的培训,并且两者都将优于无培训。此外,我们假设此简短的培训课程将导致LUS技能类似于超声培训的急诊医学(EM)医师。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号