首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >The Entropy Module and Bispectral Index as guidance for propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with regional anaesthesia compared with a standard clinical practice group.
【24h】

The Entropy Module and Bispectral Index as guidance for propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with regional anaesthesia compared with a standard clinical practice group.

机译:与标准临床实践组相比,熵模块和双光谱指数可作为丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉与区域麻醉相结合的指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was designed to investigate the impact of the Entropy Module and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring on drug consumption and recovery times compared with standard anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using a combination of regional and general anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist. We hypothesised that electroencephalogram monitoring would lead to a lower drug consumption as well as shorter recovery times. With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 90 adult patients undergoing surgery to the upper or lower extremity received regional anaesthesia for post- and intraoperative pain control and were randomised to receive general anaesthesia by propofol/remifentanil infusion controlled either solely by clinical parameters or by targeting Entropy or BIS values of 50. Recovery times and drug consumption were recorded. Data from 79 patients were analysed. Compared with standard practice, patients with Entropy or BIS monitoring showed a similar propofol consumption (standard practice 101 +/- 22 microg/kg/minute, Entropy 106 +/- 24 microg/kg/minute, BIS 104 +/- 20 microg/kg/minute) and showed similar Aldrete scores (10/10) one minute after extubation: 9.1 +/- 0.3, 9.2 +/- 0.6 and 9.3 +/- 0.5, respectively. Time points of extubation were 7.3 +/- 2.9 minutes, 9.2 +/- 3.9 minutes and 6.8 +/- 2.9 minutes, respectively, demonstrating a significant difference between Entropy and BIS (P = 0.023). Compared with standard practice, targeting an Entropy or BIS value of 50 did not result in a reduction of propofol consumption during general anaesthesia combined with regional anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist in orthopaedic patients.
机译:这项研究旨在调查由经验丰富的麻醉师进行的区域麻醉和全身麻醉联合整形外科手术患者在进行整形外科手术时,熵模块和双光谱指数(BIS)监测对药物消耗和恢复时间与标准麻醉实践相比的影响。我们假设脑电图监测将导致更低的药物消耗以及更短的恢复时间。在获得机构审查委员会的批准和书面知情同意的情况下,对90名接受上肢或下肢手术的成年患者进行了区域麻醉以控制术后和术中疼痛,并随机分配丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼输注进行全身麻醉,这些输注仅由临床参数或通过将熵或BIS值定为50。记录了恢复时间和药物消耗。分析了来自79例患者的数据。与标准做法相比,接受熵或BIS监测的患者显示出相似的丙泊酚消耗量(标准做法为101 +/- 22微克/千克/分钟,熵106 +/- 24微克/千克/分钟,BIS 104 +/- 20微克/拔管后一分钟显示的Aldrete分数(10/10)相似:分别为9.1 +/- 0.3、9.2 +/- 0.6和9.3 +/- 0.5。拔管的时间点分别为7.3 +/- 2.9分钟,9.2 +/- 3.9分钟和6.8 +/- 2.9分钟,表明熵和BIS之间存在显着差异(P = 0.023)。与标准做法相比,将骨科医师中经验丰富的麻醉师进行的全身麻醉与区域麻醉相结合,将熵或BIS值设定为50不会导致丙泊酚消耗量的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号