...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >From CEMD to CEMACH to CMACE to...? Where now for the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths?
【24h】

From CEMD to CEMACH to CMACE to...? Where now for the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths?

机译:从CEMD到CEMACH再到CMACE到...?现在要在哪里秘密询问产妇死亡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this issue of Anaesthesia, the work of Pagel and Hudetz on 'scholarly productivity' of US anaesthesiologists, using the 'h-score' [1], coincides with an article using the same measure for UK anaesthetists [2]. How best to measure academic productivity? Measuring clinical productivity is relatively easy: anaesthetists are locatable to the operating theatre (or pain clinic, labour ward or intensive care unit). Notwithstanding quality outputs such as pain scores, satisfaction, etc., the clear time-based metric underpins UK consultant contracts ('programmed activities') and facilitates workload calculations [3]. Time-based analyses can assess shortfalls in staffing in anaesthetic departments [4], and measure efficiency [5] and productivity across specialities [6, 7].
机译:在本期《麻醉》中,佩奇(Pagel)和胡德兹(Hudetz)使用“ h分数” [1]研究美国麻醉医师的“学者生产率”的工作与一篇针对英国麻醉师使用相同方法的文章相吻合[2]。如何最好地衡量学术生产力?测量临床生产率相对容易:麻醉师可在手术室(或疼痛诊所,劳动病房或重症监护室)找到。尽管有诸如疼痛评分,满意度等质量输出,清晰的基于时间的指标还是英国顾问合同(“计划活动”)的基础,并简化了工作量计算[3]。基于时间的分析可以评估麻醉科人员短缺的情况[4],并衡量​​各个专业的效率[5]和生产率[6,7]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号