...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system
【24h】

Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system

机译:正畸软组织参数:锥形束计算机断层扫描与3dMD成像系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Orthodontists rely heavily on soft-tissue analysis to determine facial esthetics and treatment stability. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the equivalence of soft-tissue measurements between the 3dMD imaging system (3dMD, Atlanta, Ga) and the segmented skin surface images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Methods Seventy preexisting 3dMD facial photographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans taken within minutes of each other for the same subjects were registered in 3 dimensions and superimposed using Vultus (3dMD) software. After reliability studies, 28 soft-tissue measurements were recorded with both imaging modalities and compared to analyze their equivalence. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess interexaminer and intraexaminer repeatability and agreement. Summary statistics were calculated for all measurements. To demonstrate equivalence of the 2 methods, the difference needed a 95% confidence interval contained entirely within the equivalence limits defined by the repeatability results. Results Statistically significant differences were reported for the vermilion height, mouth width, total facial width, mouth symmetry, soft-tissue lip thickness, and eye symmetry. Conclusions There are areas of nonequivalence between the 2 imaging methods; however, the differences are clinically acceptable from the orthodontic point of view.
机译:简介牙齿矫正医生非常依赖软组织分析来确定面部美学和治疗稳定性。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定3dMD成像系统(3dMD,亚特兰大,佐治亚州)与从锥束计算机断层摄影术得出的分割皮肤表面图像之间的软组织测量值是否相等。方法在同一分钟内,对彼此在几分钟内拍摄的70张3dMD面部照片和锥束计算机断层扫描进行3维记录,并使用Vultus(3dMD)软件进行叠加。经过可靠性研究后,用两种成像方式记录了28个软组织测量值,并进行比较以分析它们的等效性。使用类内相关系数和Bland-Altman图来评估检查者之间和检查者内部的可重复性和一致性。计算所有测量的摘要统计量。为了证明这两种方法的等效性,差异需要95%的置信区间完全包含在可重复性结果定义的等效限度内。结果据报道,朱红色高度,嘴巴宽度,面部总宽度,嘴巴对称性,软组织嘴唇厚度和眼睛对称性存在统计学差异。结论两种成像方法之间存在不相等的区域。但是,从正畸学的角度来看,这些差异在临床上是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号