首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
【24h】

Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.

机译:双板矫治器和面罩疗法治疗III类错牙合畸形的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the first group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 3 months), each subject wore a DPA with 2 Class III elastics, which exerted a force of 350-400 g day and night except for meals. In the second group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 5 months), each subject wore a Delaire-type FM with a removable intraoral appliance with a total force of 600 g. The patients were instructed to wear the appliance approximately 16 hours a day. An untreated control group (6 girls, 8 boys; mean age, 9 years 8 months) was formed that matched the treatment groups according to sagittal skeletal and dental classifications. Thirteen angular and 14 linear measurements were evaluated. The increase in ANB angle and the decrease in maxillomandibular differential in the treated groups showed significant differences compared with the control group (P < .05). The increases in ANB and SNA angles in the FM group were significantly greater than in the DPA group (P < .05). The increases in lower facial height and Me-ANS in the FM group were significantly different compared with the other groups (P < .05). The overjet increased significantly in both treatment groups (P < .001), but, in the DPA group, overjet was significantly greater than in the FM group (P < .05). Protrusion of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the mandibular incisors in the DPA group showed significant differences compared with the other groups (P < .05).
机译:这项研究的目的是比较双板矫治器(DPA)和面罩(FM)在治疗骨骼III类错牙合畸形中的作用。数据基于28位患有骨骼和牙齿III类错牙合畸形的受试者的治疗前和治疗后的侧位脑电图。在第一组(7名女孩,7名男孩;平均年龄,10岁3个月)中,每位受试者都穿着带有2种III类松紧带的DPA,除了进餐外,其昼夜施加的力为350-400 g。在第二组(7名女孩,7名男孩;平均年龄,10岁5个月)中,每名受试者都佩戴了Delaire型FM,其可移动的口内矫治器的总力为600 g。指示患者每天大约16小时佩戴电器。根据矢状骨骼和牙齿的分类,形成了一个与治疗组匹配的未经治疗的对照组(6名女孩,8名男孩;平均年龄,9岁8个月)。评估了13个角度和14个线性测量值。与对照组相比,治疗组的ANB角度增加和颌下颌差异减小有显着性差异(P <.05)。 FM组的ANB和SNA角度增加明显大于DPA组(P <.05)。 FM组下面部高度和Me-ANS的增加与其他组相比有显着差异(P <.05)。在两个治疗组中,过喷射明显增加(P <.001),但是在DPA组中,过喷射显着大于FM组(P <.05)。与其他组相比,DPA组上颌切牙的突出和下颌切牙的突出显示出显着差异(P <.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号