...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: A human skull study.
【24h】

Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: A human skull study.

机译:直接数字和基于胶片的头颅X线照片上的地标识别:一项人类头骨研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in landmark identification on vertically scanned, direct digital and conventional (18 x 24 cm) cephalometric radiographs. Eight observers, all orthodontists or postgraduate orthodontic students, recorded 6 landmarks twice on 3 digital and 3 conventional cephalograms obtained from 3 human skulls in a standardized fashion. Digital images were displayed on a 15.1-in TFT monitor in 3:1 mode (20 x 26 cm). Recordings were transferred into standardized coordinate systems and evaluated separately for each coordinate. After correcting for magnification, precision was assessed with Maloney-Rastogi tests, and intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was calculated from squared differences. Effective magnification was larger for the digital images (x, 13%; y, 12%). Significantly different (P <.05) precision was found for nasion (N), posterior nasal spine (PNS), sella (S), supraspinale (A), and orbitale (Or), but average differences were entirely below 1 mm. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility did not differ significantly between the 2 image modes. Squared differences were largest for PNS and Or in both modalities. Our results indicate comparable errors in landmark recording for both evaluated machines. However, these results must be considered in the context of the specific display conditions for digital images, because no general standard exists for this purpose.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查在垂直扫描,直接数字和常规(18 x 24 cm)头颅X线照片上地标识别的差异。八名观察员,全部是正畸医生或研究生正畸学生,以标准方式从3个人类头骨获得的3张数字和3张常规头颅图上两次记录了6个地标。数字图像以3:1模式(20 x 26厘米)显示在15.1英寸TFT监视器上。记录被转移到标准化坐标系中,并对每个坐标分别进行评估。校正放大倍率后,通过Maloney-Rastogi测试评估精度,并根据平方差计算观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。对于数字图像,有效放大倍数较大(x,13%; y,12%)。鼻根(N),鼻后脊柱(PNS),蝶鞍(S),脊椎上颌骨(A)和眼眶(Or)的精度差异显着(P <.05),但平均差异完全在1毫米以下。观察者之间和观察者内部的再现性在两种图像模式之间没有显着差异。在两种方式中,PNS和Or的平方差最大。我们的结果表明两种评估机器在地标记录中存在可比的错误。但是,必须在数字图像的特定显示条件下考虑这些结果,因为不存在用于此目的的通用标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号