首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Long-term stability of combined rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper therapy followed by full fixed appliances.
【24h】

Long-term stability of combined rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper therapy followed by full fixed appliances.

机译:联合快速固定expansion上扩张器的长期稳定性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term postretention stability of rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper therapy followed by full fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample included 20 treated patients (11 women and 9 men) who were recalled to obtain postretention records. The subjects were out of retention for a minimum of 4 years and an average of 7.9 years. They had begun treatment in the late mixed dentition at a mean age of 11.1 with considerable incisor crowding but, on average, no tooth size-arch length discrepancies. Pretreatment, posttreatment (mean age, 13.6 years), and postretention (mean age, 24.3 years) models were digitized, and the computed measurements were compared with untreated reference data. RESULTS: The majority of treatment increases in maxillary and mandibular arch dimensions were statistically significant (P < .05) and greater than expected for untreated controls. Although many measurements decreased postretention, net gains were maintained for 21 of the 30 measurements evaluated. The notable exception was arch perimeter, which decreased to less than pretreatment values. Postretention incisor irregularity increased 0.5 +/- 1.2 mm in the maxillary arch and 1.1 +/- 1.5 mm in the mandibular arch. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the good long-term stability observed in this study, we concluded that use of rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper expansion therapy in the late mixed dentition followed by full fixed appliances is an effective form of treatment for patients with up to moderate tooth size-arch length discrepancies.
机译:引言:本研究的目的是评估快速pa骨扩张型唇缓冲器治疗后全固定装置的长期保留后稳定性。方法:样本包括20例接受治疗的患者(11名女性和9名男性)被召回以获取保留后记录。受试者被保留的时间最少为4年,平均为7.9年。他们已开始在混合牙列晚期进行治疗,平均年龄为11.1,门牙很拥挤,但平均而言,没有牙弓大小的差异。将治疗前,治疗后(平均年龄13.6岁)和保留后(平均年龄24.3岁)模型数字化,并将计算出的测量值与未经处理的参考数据进行比较。结果:上颌和下颌弓尺寸的大多数治疗增加在统计学上均具有统计学意义(P <.05),并且比未治疗的对照组的预期要大。尽管许多测量降低了保留后的值,但是在评估的30个测量中,有21个保持了净收益。值得注意的例外是足弓周长,该周长降低到小于预处理值。保留后门牙不规则性在上颌弓增加了0.5 +/- 1.2 mm,在下颌弓增加了1.1 +/- 1.5 mm。结论:基于本研究中观察到的良好的长期稳定性,我们得出结论,在晚期混合牙列中使用快速pa裂扩张-唇缓冲器扩张疗法,然后使用完全固定的矫治器,是中度以下患者的有效治疗方式牙齿大小-牙弓长度的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号