...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Re: 'problems with risk reclassification methods for evaluating prediction models'.
【24h】

Re: 'problems with risk reclassification methods for evaluating prediction models'.

机译:回复:“风险重分类方法用于评估预测模型的问题”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In her recent Journal article, Pepe (1) takes a strong stance against reclassification, particularly the reclassification calibration test. Although I agree with several comments, I disagree with her dismissal of this test. Pepe's mathematical assumptions are based on the average predicted risk from the full model equaling the observed risk within reclassified categories. There are several reasons beyond sampling variation why this may not hold in practice. The model may not provide a good fit within the ranges of interest. This is particularly true when interest focuses on those at intermediate or high risk within generally low-risk population-based cohorts. The extent of reclassification may also be too small and random in the higher, more meaningful categories.
机译:佩佩(1)在她最近的《华尔街日报》文章中,强烈反对重新分类,特别是重新分类校准测试。尽管我同意一些评论,但我不同意她对这项测试的驳回。佩佩(Pepe)的数学假设基于完整模型的平均预测风险等于重分类类别中的观测风险。除了采样差异外,还有几个原因可能导致这种情况在实践中不成立。该模型可能无法在关注范围内提供良好的拟合度。当兴趣集中在一般基于低风险人群的人群中处于中等或高风险人群时,尤其如此。在较高,更有意义的类别中,重新分类的程度也可能太小且随机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号