...
【24h】

THREE AUTHORS REPLY

机译:三位作者的回覆

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We thank Parratt et al. (1) for their interest in our study (2), in which we found a 50 percent reduction in the risk of multiple sclerosis among penicillin users (at least 3 weeks of use) compared with nonusers during the 3 years before the onset of the disease. Our study findings did not support our original hypothesis that use of antibiotics effective against Chlamydophila pneumoniae was associated with a lower risk of multiple sclerosis. However, this lack of evidence cannot be construed as proof of the absence of an association between chronic infection by C. pneumoniae and multiple sclerosis, as Parratt et al. point out in their letter (1), and as we acknowledge in our paper (2). For example, if the microorganism increases multiple sclerosis risk through chronic stimulation of the immune system, our study design may be unable to find an association, because it is known that short-term treatment for acute respiratory illness (the usual clinical manifestation of C. pneumoniae infection) does not suffice to eliminate this organism in patients with chronic infection (3). Similar arguments have been repeatedly raised to explain the lack of effect of antichlamydial antibiotics in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes (4)
机译:我们感谢Parratt等。 (1)由于他们对我们的研究(2)感兴趣,因此我们发现青霉素使用者(发病至少3周)与非使用者在发病前3年相比,多发性硬化的风险降低了50%疾病。我们的研究结果不支持我们最初的假设,即使用对肺炎衣原体有效的抗生素与多发性硬化症的风险较低相关。但是,如Parratt等人所述,缺乏证据不能解释为肺炎衣原体慢性感染与多发性硬化之间不存在关联的证据。在他们的信(1)中指出,正如我们在论文(2)中所承认的那样。例如,如果微生物通过免疫系统的长期刺激而增加了多发性硬化症的风险,则我们的研究设计可能找不到关联,因为众所周知,急性呼吸道疾病的短期治疗(C的通常临床表现)。肺炎感染)不足以消除患有慢性感染的患者体内的这种微生物(3)。反复提出类似的论点来解释抗衣原体抗生素在心血管预后的二级预防中缺乏作用(4)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号