...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in postmenopausal white, black, hispanic, and asianwomenwith andwithout diabetes in the United States: The Women's Health Initiative, 1993-2009
【24h】

All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in postmenopausal white, black, hispanic, and asianwomenwith andwithout diabetes in the United States: The Women's Health Initiative, 1993-2009

机译:美国,绝经后白人,黑人,西班牙裔和亚裔妇女有无糖尿病的全因,心血管和癌症死亡率:妇女健康倡议,1993-2009年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Using data from theWomen's Health Initiative (1993-2009; n = 158,833 participants, of whom 84.1% were white, 9.2% were black, 4.1% were Hispanic, and 2.6% were Asian), we compared all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in white, black, Hispanic, and Asian postmenopausal women with and without diabetes. Cox proportional hazard models were used for the comparison from which hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed. Within each racial/ethnic subgroup, women with diabetes had an approximately 2-3 times higher risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality than did those without diabetes. However, the hazard ratios for mortality outcomes were not significantly different between racial/ethnic subgroups. Population attributable risk percentages (PARPs) take into account both the prevalence of diabetes and hazard ratios. For all-cause mortality, whites had the lowest PARP (11.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.1, 12.1), followed by Asians (12.9, 95% CI: 4.7, 20.9), blacks (19.4, 95% CI: 15.0, 23.7), and Hispanics (23.2, 95% CI: 14.8, 31.2). To our knowledge, the present study is the first to show that hazard ratios for mortality outcomes were not significantly different between racial/ethnic subgroups when stratified by diabetes status. Because of the "amplifying" effect of diabetes prevalence, efforts to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in the rate of death from diabetes should focus on prevention of diabetes.
机译:使用妇女健康倡议(1993-2009; n = 158,833的参与者,其中白人占84.1%,黑人占9.2%,西班牙裔占4.1%,亚洲裔占2.6%)的数据,我们比较了全因,心血管和癌症患有和不患有糖尿病的白人,黑人,西班牙裔和绝经后亚洲妇女的死亡率。使用Cox比例风险模型进行比较,从中计算出风险比率和95%置信区间。在每个种族/族裔亚组中,糖尿病女性的全因,心血管疾病和癌症死亡风险比非糖尿病女性高大约2-3倍。但是,种族/族裔亚组的死亡率结果的危险比没有显着差异。人群归因风险百分比(PARP)同时考虑了糖尿病的患病率和危险比。对于全因死亡率,白人的PARP最低(11.1,95%置信区间(CI):10.1,12.1),其次是亚洲人(12.9,95%CI:4.7,20.9),黑人(19.4,95%CI: 15.0、23.7)和西班牙裔(23.2,95%CI:14.8、31.2)。据我们所知,本研究是第一个表明按糖尿病状况分层时,种族/族裔亚组之间死亡率结果的危险比没有显着差异。由于糖尿病患病率的“放大”作用,为减少种族/族裔差异而导致的糖尿病死亡率的努力应集中在预防糖尿病上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号