首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Neighborhood amenities and mobility in older adults
【24h】

Neighborhood amenities and mobility in older adults

机译:老年人的社区便利设施和流动性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Diversity of neighborhood amenities may promote the mobility of older adults. A 2010 community-based sample of 510 adults aged ≥65 years in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and geospatial data from the Esri Business Analyst database (Esri, Inc., Redlands, California) were used to assess associations of neighborhood amenity diversity with mobility. Neighborhoods were defined by census tract, and diversity of amenities was derived by using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design's neighborhood development index (US Green Building Council, Washington, DC). Generalized estimating equations adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and neighborhood characteristics were used to estimate differences in mobility score by tertile of amenity diversity. Analyses were stratified by participants' routine travel habits (stayed at home, stayed in home zip code, or traveled beyond home zip code). We found that for those who spent most of their time in their home neighborhoods, mobility scores (from the Life-Space Assessment, which ranges from 0 to 104 points) were 8.3 points higher (95% confidence interval: 0.1, 16.6) among those who lived in neighborhoods with the most amenity diversity compared with those who lived in neighborhoods with the least amenity diversity. No significant associations between amenity diversity and mobility were observed for those who did not leave home or who regularly traveled outside their neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with a high diversity of amenities may be important promoters of mobility in older adults who do not routinely travel outside their neighborhoods.
机译:社区便利设施的多样性可能会促进老年人的流动性。在2010年基于社区的样本中,宾夕法尼亚州费城的510名年龄≥65岁的成年人和Esri Business Analyst数据库(Esri,Inc.,Redlands,California)的地理空间数据用于评估邻里便利设施多样性与流动性之间的关联。社区由人口普查区定义,而便利设施的多样性是通过使用“能源与环境设计领导力”社区发展指数(美国绿色建筑委员会,华盛顿特区)得出的。使用针对人口,社会经济和邻里特征进行调整的广义估计方程,通过便利性多样性的三分位数来估计流动性得分的差异。根据参加者的日常出行习惯(呆在家里,呆在家里的邮政编码或走出家里的邮政编码)对分析进行分层。我们发现,对于那些将大部分时间都花在家附近的人,其流动性得分(根据生活空间评估,从0到104分不等)高8.3点(95%置信区间:0.1、16.6)与那些生活设施多样性最少的社区的人相比,他们生活在环境多样性最多的社区。对于那些没有出门或经常出门在外的人来说,便利设施的多样性和流动性之间没有显着的联系。设施多样性高的社区可能是老年人不定期出门旅行的重要推动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号