...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Re: 'Neighborhood poverty and injection cessation in a sample of injection drug users'.
【24h】

Re: 'Neighborhood poverty and injection cessation in a sample of injection drug users'.

机译:回复:“注射吸毒者样本中的邻里贫穷和戒烟”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read with great interest the recent Journal article by Nandi et al. (1) on the role of neighborhood poverty as a potential determinant of injection cessation among injection drug users. The authors fitted and contrasted 4 logistic regression models: "crude," "baseline adjusted," "fully adjusted," and one based on inverse-probability weighting (IPW). The results obtained from the IPW model were taken to be valid, whereas those from the other 3 models-including, notably, the "fully adjusted" one-were taken to be biased. Specifically, in the Discussion section of their article, the authors state the following: "These divergent results suggest that use of traditional regression to handle confounding in neighborhood effects studies may induce bias because the individual-level characteristics frequently adjusted for may be time-dependent covariates affected by prior exposure" (1, p. 395).
机译:我非常感兴趣地阅读了Nandi等人最近发表的Journal杂志。 (1)邻里贫困在注射吸毒者中作为停止注射的潜在决定因素的作用。作者对4种逻辑回归模型进行了拟合和对比:“粗略”,“基线调整”,“完全调整”,以及一种基于逆概率加权(IPW)的模型。从IPW模型获得的结果被认为是有效的,而从其他3个模型(尤其是包括“完全调整”的模型)获得的结果被认为是有偏差的。具体来说,在他们的文章的“讨论”部分中,作者指出:“这些分歧的结果表明,在邻里效应研究中使用传统回归来处理混杂问题可能会引起偏差,因为经常调整的个体水平特征可能是时间依赖性的。共变量受先前暴露的影响”(1,第395页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号