【24h】

The origins of anthropological genetics

机译:人类遗传学的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although we often date the conflict of "molecules and morphology" in biological anthropology to the 1962Wenner-Gren conference "Classification and Human Evolution," the roots of the conflict extend considerably deeper. In the first half of the twentieth century, two established research traditions applied genetic data to problems in physical anthropology: racial serology and systematic serology. These had a tense relationship with the more mainstream areas of racial anthropology and primate taxonomy. Both produced conclusions that were often difficult to reconcile with traditional physical anthropology but that laid claim to the authoritative voices of genetics and evolution. They were also less relevant and less threatening to general anthropology than the other movement for the application of genetics to anthropological problems-eugenics-had been. I discuss the relations of genetics to anthropology as manifested in the areas of eugenics, race, and primate taxonomy in the early twentieth century and the field's transformation into anthropological genetics in the 1960s.
机译:尽管我们经常将生物学人类学中“分子和形态学”的冲突追溯到1962年的温纳-格伦会议“分类与人类进化”,但冲突的根源更加深远。在20世纪上半叶,两个成熟的研究传统将遗传数据应用于身体人类学中的问题:种族血清学和系统血清学。这些与种族人类学和灵长类动物分类学等更为主流的领域有着紧张的关系。两者都得出的结论通常很难与传统的人类学相提并论,但却要求遗传学和进化论具有权威性。与其他将遗传学应用于人类学问题(优生学)的运动相比,它们与普通人类学的相关性和威胁性也较小。我讨论了遗传学与人类学的关系,这在二十世纪初的优生学,种族和灵长类生物分类学领域以及在1960年代该领域向人类学遗传学的转变中得到了证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号